Rule 223.Conduct of the Trial. Generally.
Adopted September 8, 1938 · Last amended April 29, 2016 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 223
Plain-English Summary
This rule confirms the court’s authority to run the trial, bounded by due process and the parties’ constitutional rights. It lists examples of what the court may regulate rather than setting fixed limits.
Those examples include limiting the number of witnesses whose testimony is similar or cumulative, limiting how many attorneys for the same side may actively participate or examine witnesses, regulating the number and length of addresses to the jury or court, and regulating or excluding the public when the court finds it serves the public good, order, or morals.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the court limit how many witnesses or attorneys participate at trial?
Yes. Subject to due process and constitutional rights, the court may limit cumulative witnesses and limit how many attorneys for the same party actively participate or examine witnesses.
Official Note
Official Note: Trial courts in Pennsylvania customarily exercise discretion as to the exclusion of persons from the courtroom in the interest of good order and morals. The exclusion of the taking of photographs or radio or television broadcasting is governed by Pa.R.J.A. No. 1910.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 223 adopted September 8, 1938, effective March 20, 1939; amended January 25, 1971, effective February 1, 1971; amended June 23, 1975, effective immediately, 5 Pa.B. 1819; amended November 3, 1999, effective January 1, 2000, 29 Pa.B. 5918; amended April 29, 2016, effective immediately, 46 Pa.B. 2409. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (380173) to (380174).