RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 21.080.Electronic Filing and Electronic Filing Deadlines

Current through August 1, 2026 · Last verified September 12, 2026

In one sentenceUTCR 21.080 keeps the electronic filing system open around the clock, sets the filing deadline at 11:59:59 p.m. in the court's time zone, ties the filing date to when the system received the document, and provides relation-back after a rejection or a system failure.

Full Text of Rule 21.080

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

(1) A filer may use the electronic filing system at any time, except when the electronic filing system is temporarily unavailable.
(2) The filing deadline for any document filed electronically is 11:59:59 p.m. in the time zone where the court is located on the day the document must be filed.
(3) The court considers a document submitted for an electronic filing when the electronic filing system receives the document. The electronic filing system will send an email to the filer that includes the date and time of receipt, unless the filer has elected through system settings not to receive the email.
(4) If the court accepts the document for filing, the date and time of filing entered in the register relate back to the date and time the electronic filing system received the document. When the court accepts the document, the electronic filing system will affix the date and time of submission on the document, thereby indicating the date and time of filing of the document. When the court accepts a document for filing, the electronic filing system sends an email to the filer, unless the filer has elected through system settings not to receive the email.
(a) The provisions of this subsection do not apply to a proposed order or judgment, or to any other document that requires court signature, that is electronically filed.
(b) When the court accepts a proposed order or judgment or any other document that requires court signature through the electronic filing system, the document is deemed submitted for judge review.
(5) If the court rejects a document submitted electronically for filing, the electronic filing system will send an email to the filer that explains why the court rejected the document, unless the filer has elected through system settings not to receive the email. The email will include a hyperlink to the document.
(a) A filer who resubmits a document within three days of the date of rejection under this section may request, as part of the resubmission, that the date of filing of the resubmitted document relate back to the date of submission of the original document to meet filing requirements. If the third day following rejection is not a judicial day, then the filer may resubmit the filing with a request under this subsection on the next judicial day. For purposes of this subsection, resubmission means submission of the document through the electronic filing system under section (3) of this rule or physical delivery of the document to the court. A filer who resubmits a document under this subsection must include:
(i) A cover letter that sets out the date of the original submission and the date of rejection and that explains the reason for requesting that the date of filing relate back to the original submission, with the words “RESUBMISSION OF REJECTED FILING, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED” in the subject line of the cover letter; and
(ii) If an electronic resubmission, the words “RESUBMISSION OF REJECTED FILING, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED” in the Filing Comments field.
(b) A responding party may object to a request under subsection (a) of this section within the time limits as provided by law for the type of document being filed. For the purpose of calculating the time for objection provided by law under this subsection, if applicable, the date of filing is the date that the document was resubmitted to the court under subsection (a) of this section.
(6) Except as provided in subsection (c), if the eFiling system is temporarily unavailable or if an error in the transmission of the document or other technical problem prevents the eFiling system from receiving a document, the court must, upon satisfactory proof, permit the filing date of the document to relate back to the date that the eFiler first attempted to file the document to meet filing requirements.
(a) A filer seeking relation-back of the filing date due to system unavailability or transmission error described in this section must comply with the requirements in subsection (5)(a) of this rule.
(i) The cover letter described in subsection (5)(a)(i) must include the date of the original attempted submission and the date that the filer was notified that the submission was not successful, and explain the reason for requesting that the date of filing relate back to the original submission, with the words “RESUBMISSION OF FILING, SUBMISSION UNSUCCESSFUL, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED” in the subject line of the cover letter.
(ii) The Filing Comment field notification for an electronic resubmission described in subsection (5)(a)(ii) must include the words “RESUBMISSION OF FILING, SUBMISSION UNSUCCESSFUL, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED.”
(iii) The filer may include supporting exhibits that substantiate the system malfunction together with the filer’s cover letter.
(b) A responding party may object in the same manner and subject to the same time calculations as in subsection (5)(b) of this rule.
(c) Technical problems with the filer’s equipment or attempted transmission of a document within the filer’s control will not generally excuse an untimely filing. A court may permit the filing date to relate back to the date that the eFiler first attempted to file the document only upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances based on satisfactory proof. A filer seeking relation-back under this subsection must comply with subsection (6)(a) of this rule and must, in the cover letter, explain why extraordinary circumstances exist.
End

Plain-English Summary

Start with timing. A filer may use the system at any time except when it is temporarily unavailable, and a document due on a given day is timely if filed by 11:59:59 p.m. in the time zone where the court is located. The court considers a document submitted when the system receives it, and the system emails the filer the date and time of receipt unless the filer has turned that email off in system settings.

Acceptance relates back. If the court accepts the document, the date and time of filing entered in the register go back to the moment the system received it, and the system affixes that date and time on the document. Acceptance generates its own email, subject to the same setting. Documents needing the court's signature sit outside this: when the court accepts a proposed order or judgment, or any other document requiring court signature, that document is deemed submitted for judge review rather than treated as a completed filing.

Rejection is recoverable. If the court rejects a submission, the system emails the filer an explanation and a hyperlink to the document. A filer who resubmits within three days of the rejection date may ask that the filing date relate back to the original submission, and if the third day is not a judicial day, the next judicial day works. Resubmission means either another electronic submission or physical delivery of the document to the court. The request needs a cover letter giving the original submission date, the rejection date, and the reason for the request, carrying the words RESUBMISSION OF REJECTED FILING, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED in its subject line, and the same words in the Filing Comments field for an electronic resubmission. A responding party may object within the time the law allows for that type of document, counted from the resubmission date.

System failure works much the same way, with different words. If the system is temporarily unavailable, or a transmission error or other technical problem keeps it from receiving the document, the court must, on satisfactory proof, permit the filing date to relate back to the filer's first attempt. The cover letter gives the date of the attempted submission and the date the filer learned it had failed, and carries the words RESUBMISSION OF FILING, SUBMISSION UNSUCCESSFUL, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED, with the same words in the Filing Comments field. Supporting exhibits substantiating the malfunction may go along. Trouble on the filer's own end is treated differently: technical problems with the filer's equipment or transmission will not generally excuse an untimely filing, and relation back there requires a showing of extraordinary circumstances on satisfactory proof, explained in the cover letter.

Frequently Asked Questions

What time is the eFiling deadline in Oregon?

11:59:59 p.m. in the time zone where the court is located, on the day the document must be filed. The system itself is available at any time except when it is temporarily unavailable.

My eFiling was rejected — can I keep my original filing date?

You can ask for it. Resubmit within three days of the rejection date, or on the next judicial day if the third day following rejection is not a judicial day, and request as part of the resubmission that the filing date relate back to the original submission.

Include a cover letter with the original submission date, the rejection date, and the reason for the request, with RESUBMISSION OF REJECTED FILING, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED in the subject line and, for an electronic resubmission, in the Filing Comments field. The other side may object within the time the law allows for that type of document.

What happens if the eFiling system is down when my deadline hits?

If the system is temporarily unavailable, or a transmission error or other technical problem stops it from receiving your document, the court must permit the filing date to relate back to the date you first attempted to file, on satisfactory proof.

You follow the same resubmission mechanics as a rejection, using the words RESUBMISSION OF FILING, SUBMISSION UNSUCCESSFUL, RELATION-BACK DATE OF FILING REQUESTED, and you may attach exhibits substantiating the malfunction.

Is a proposed order treated as filed when the court accepts it?

No. When the court accepts a proposed order or judgment, or any other document requiring court signature, the document is deemed submitted for judge review. The relation-back provision for accepted filings does not apply to it.

My own internet went out — does that excuse a late filing?

Not on its own. Technical problems with the filer's equipment or attempted transmission, within the filer's control, will not generally excuse an untimely filing.

The court may still permit relation back to the first attempt, but only on a showing of extraordinary circumstances based on satisfactory proof, explained in the cover letter that accompanies the resubmission.

Source & verification. The rule text is reproduced verbatim from the official Oregon Uniform Trial Court Rules (UTCR 21.080). Prescribed by the Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court (UTCR 1.020). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified September 12, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: oregon efiling deadline timerejected efiling relation back oregonefiling system unavailable deadline oregonresubmission of rejected filingwhen is a document deemed filed oregon efilingproposed order submitted for judge review