§ 91.Actions Barred Not Revived
Chapter 3: Limitations of Actions · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 91
Amendment History
R.L. 1910, § 4653.
Plain-English Summary
This is a transitional savings clause left over from the 1910 recodification. When Oklahoma adopted its limitations article, lawmakers didn't want the new scheme to accidentally revive stale claims that an earlier statute had already barred, or to shorten protections that had already accrued under the old law. Section 91 says neither happens: claims barred before stay barred, and periods already running for older claims don't get extended either.
The substantive deadlines live elsewhere, mainly in §§ 92 through 96. Section 91 just fixes the starting line for the whole scheme.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did adopting this limitations article revive old, already-barred claims?
No, Section 91 says a claim already barred under a prior statute stays barred; the article doesn't revive it.
Does this section shorten deadlines for claims that arose before the article took effect?
No, it says prior limitation periods aren't extended for such claims either, preserving whatever protection already applied.
Does this section set any new filing deadlines?
No, it creates no limitation periods of its own; the actual deadlines appear in later sections such as § 93 and § 95.
Why does a savings clause like this still matter today?
It establishes the general principle, still cited today, that Oklahoma's limitations statutes don't reach back and revive dead claims.