RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 6313.Temporary restraining order.

Article 63. Injunction · Last amended 1982 · Last verified July 21, 2026

In one sentenceCPLR 6313 lets a court grant a temporary restraining order without notice when immediate and irreparable injury is threatened, but requires personal service like a summons, sets an early hearing date for the preliminary injunction, and bars TROs in labor disputes or against public officers performing statutory duties.

Full Text of CPLR 6313

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Generally. If, on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the plaintiff shall show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damages will result unless the defendant is restrained before a hearing can be had, a temporary restraining order may be granted without notice. Upon granting a temporary restraining order, the court shall set the hearing for the preliminary injunction at the earliest possible time. No temporary restraining order may be granted in an action arising out of a labor dispute as defined in section eight hundred seven of the labor law, nor against a public officer, board or municipal corporation of the state to restrain the performance of statutory duties.
(b) Service. Unless the court orders otherwise, a temporary restraining order together with the papers upon which it was based, and a notice of hearing for the preliminary injunction, shall be personally served in the same manner as a summons.
(c) Undertaking. Prior to the granting of a temporary restraining order the court may, in its discretion, require the plaintiff to give an undertaking in an amount to be fixed by the court, containing terms similar to those set forth in subdivision (b) of rule 6312, and subject to the exception set forth therein.

Plain-English Summary

Subdivision (a) allows a court to grant a temporary restraining order without notice to the defendant, on a showing that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage would occur before a preliminary injunction hearing could otherwise be held. Because that relief comes without the defendant's input, the section requires the court to set the preliminary injunction hearing at the earliest possible time once the TRO issues. Two categories are off-limits entirely: no TRO may be granted in an action arising out of a labor dispute as defined in Labor Law section 807, and none may be granted against a public officer, board, or municipal corporation of the state to restrain the performance of statutory duties.

Subdivision (b) governs how the order reaches the defendant. Unless the court directs otherwise, the TRO, the papers supporting it, and the notice of the preliminary injunction hearing must be personally served the same way a summons would be, giving the defendant formal, individualized notice of an order issued without any chance to be heard beforehand.

Subdivision (c) leaves the undertaking question to the court's discretion. Before granting a TRO, the court may require the plaintiff to post an undertaking, in an amount it fixes, on terms similar to those CPLR 6312(b) sets for a preliminary injunction, and subject to the same exceptions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a New York court grant a TRO without notifying the defendant?

Yes. CPLR 6313(a) allows a TRO without notice on a showing that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage would result before a preliminary injunction hearing could be held.

How fast must a hearing be scheduled after a TRO is granted?

The court must set the preliminary injunction hearing at the earliest possible time once it grants the TRO, since the TRO is meant only to bridge the gap until that hearing.

Can you get a TRO against a labor union in a labor dispute?

No. CPLR 6313(a) bars a TRO in any action arising out of a labor dispute as defined in Labor Law section 807.

How must a TRO be served on the defendant?

Unless the court orders otherwise, the TRO, the papers it is based on, and the notice of the preliminary injunction hearing must be personally served in the same manner as a summons.

Is an undertaking required for a TRO in New York?

It is discretionary. CPLR 6313(c) lets the court require an undertaking before granting a TRO, on terms similar to those for a preliminary injunction under CPLR 6312(b).

Advisory Committee Notes

Subd (a) of this section is derived from CPA § 882, with simplification of language but no intended change in substance. See also § 6301. The last phrase of next to the last sentence has been inserted to preclude a restraining order without notice against a public officer, board or municipal corporation of the state; this, except for expansion to include municipal corporations, is in accord with the last phrase of CPA § 879. When a temporary restraining order is granted, the hearing on the application must be set down “at the earliest possible time.” The restraining order is therefore usually included in an order to show cause, for the notice of motion procedure would result in an unnecessary delay. The quoted words are a simplification of the language of CPA § 882 with no intended change in meaning.

Subd (b) of this section replaces CPA § 883, which provided that an “injunction order” be served by “delivering a copy thereof.” That personal delivery was contemplated may be inferred from the second sentence of CPA § 883, which provided for service upon a corporation “as prescribed by law for making personal service of a summons.” In the case of a court order, a certified copy was to be delivered; a judge’s order was served by exhibiting the original and delivering a copy. Under § 6311 as well as CPA § 882, however, a preliminary injunction may not be granted except upon notice. If the defendant has had notice of the motion, no reason appears why the order cannot be served in the manner of any other intermediate order—ordinarily by serving it with a notice of entry by mail upon the defendant’s attorney. See rule 2103. Similarly, the requirement of certification of a court order and exhibiting a judge’s order is unnecessarily stringent; other orders are binding without such formality. Under rule 2220(b), all orders are served in the same manner. See notes to rule 2220(b). A temporary restraining order, on the other hand, may be granted without notice (see subd (a); CPA § 882) and personal service in the manner of a summons seems appropriate. Accordingly, this subdivision is limited to service of a temporary restraining order. The provisions of rule 2103, governing service of papers generally, are therefore applicable to preliminary injunctions. The former New York statutory law did not expressly indicate, as does the Federal rule, that an injunction is binding “upon the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise.” Fed R Civ P 65(d). The New York decisional law, however, is substantially identical to this Federal provision. Thus an injunction may be binding even though not served. See generally 10 Carmody-Wait, Cyclopedia of New York Practice 649, 761–772 (1954). This subdivision is not intended to change this.

Amendment History

Add, L 1962, ch 308, eff Sept 1, 1963; amd, L 1962, ch 318, § 22, eff Sept 1, 1963; L 1964, ch 263, eff Sept 1, 1964; L 1982, ch 235, § 1, eff June 15, 1982.

Source & verification. Provision text, History, and Advisory Committee Notes are reproduced verbatim from the Consolidated Laws of New York. Last verified July 21, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: temporary restraining order without notice New YorkTRO service requirements New Yorklabor dispute injunction New Yorkex parte TRO CPLR