§ 4546.Loss of earnings and impairment of earning ability in actions for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice.
Article 45. Evidence · Last amended 1987 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 4546
Plain-English Summary
Lost-earnings damages create an odd tax puzzle: a jury award for future lost wages is not itself taxable income, but the wages themselves would have been taxed if the plaintiff had earned them. In medical, dental, and podiatric malpractice cases, CPLR 4546 makes the court, not the jury, responsible for sorting that out.
The statute lets the court hear evidence, outside the jury's presence, of the federal, state, and local personal income taxes the plaintiff would have owed on the earnings claimed as lost. It then instructs the jury not to make that tax deduction itself when setting the loss-of-earnings award; the jury's job is to value the loss the plaintiff suffered. Instead, the court reduces the award afterward, if the evidence supports it, by the amount of taxes it finds, with reasonable certainty, the plaintiff would have had to pay.
The rule keeps two tasks separated: the jury decides what the plaintiff lost in earning capacity, and the court decides how much of that loss represents money the plaintiff would have kept after taxes. It applies only to medical, dental, and podiatric malpractice actions, not to personal injury cases generally.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the jury decide the tax deduction for lost earnings in a malpractice case?
No. CPLR 4546 requires the court to make that deduction, and instructs the jury not to reduce the loss-of-earnings award for taxes itself.
Does CPLR 4546 apply to all personal injury cases in New York?
No, it applies specifically to medical, dental, and podiatric malpractice actions where the plaintiff seeks damages for loss of earnings or impairment of earning ability.
What evidence does the court consider under this rule?
The court considers evidence, presented outside the jury's presence, of the federal, state, and local personal income taxes the plaintiff would have been obligated to pay on the lost earnings.
Will the court always reduce the award for taxes?
Only if warranted by the evidence and only to the extent the court finds, with reasonable certainty, the amount of taxes the plaintiff would have owed.
Why does New York treat malpractice lost-earnings awards differently from ordinary wage evidence?
Because a jury award for lost earnings is not taxed the way wages would have been, CPLR 4546 has the court apply the appropriate tax offset instead of leaving juries to guess at it.
Amendment History
Add, L 1986, ch 266, § 4; amd, L 1987, ch 507, § 3, eff July 30, 1987.