Rule 4:23-5.Failure to Make Discovery
Last amended September 1, 2014 · Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 7, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4:23-5
Amendment History
New Jersey publishes each rule’s amendment record in a “History” note beneath the rule. It is reproduced verbatim below; the “R.R.” citations refer to the former Revised Rules numbering the current rules replaced.
Source - R.R. 4:23-6(c)(f), 4:25-2 (fourth sentence); paragraph (a); amended July 29, 1977 to be effective September 6, 1977; paragraph (a); amended July 16, 1981 to be effective September 14, 1981; paragraph (a); amended November 5, 1986 to be effective January 1, 1987; paragraph (a) caption; amended and subparagraphs (a)(1) captioned and; amended, and (a)(2) and (3) captioned and adopted, June 29, 1990 to be effective September 4, 1990; paragraph (a)(3); amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994; paragraph (a)(1); amended June 28, 1996 to be effective September 1, 1996; paragraph (a); amended July 10, 1998 to be effective September 1, 1998; caption; amended, paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2); amended, and new paragraph (a)(4) adopted July 5, 2000 to be effective September 5, 2000; paragraph (a)(1); amended and new paragraph (c) added July 12, 2002 to be effective September 3, 2002; paragraph (a)(1); amended and paragraph (a)(4) deleted July 27, 2006 to be effective September 1, 2006; paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2); amended July 9, 2008 to be effective September 1, 2008; subparagraphs (a)(1) and (a)(3); amended July 23, 2010 to be effective September 1, 2010; paragraph (c); amended July 19, 2012 to be effective September 4, 2012; paragraphs (a)(1) and (c); amended July 22, 2014 to be effective September 1, 2014.
Plain-English Summary
This is New Jersey’s central sanction for a party that does not provide required discovery, and it works in two stages. When a demand under the interrogatory, document, or examination rules is not met and no timely extension or protective-order motion was made, the aggrieved party moves for an order dismissing or suppressing the delinquent party’s pleading without prejudice. The delinquent party’s counsel must then notify the client, in the prescribed form, of the consequences and the need to move to restore, and the pleading can be restored by providing the discovery and paying a restoration fee.
If the default persists, the sanction hardens. After 60 days without vacation of the without-prejudice order, the aggrieved party may move to dismiss or suppress with prejudice, with strict notice-to-the-client and appearance requirements, and that motion is granted unless the discovery has been fully provided or exceptional circumstances are shown. The rule also lets a party move to compel first, and separately allows the court to bar an expert whose report was not furnished.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if you do not answer discovery in New Jersey?
The other side may move to dismiss or suppress your pleading — first without prejudice under Rule 4:23-5(a)(1), and, if the default continues for 60 days, with prejudice under (a)(2). The dismissal can be undone by providing the discovery and moving to restore, with a fee.
How do you restore a pleading dismissed for failing to provide discovery?
Move on notice to vacate the dismissal, supported by an affidavit that the withheld discovery has been fully and responsively provided, and pay the restoration fee ($100 within 30 days of the order, otherwise $300). Restoration must occur before an order with prejudice is entered.