Rule 4:23-2.Failure to comply with order
Last amended September 3, 2002 · Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 7, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4:23-2
Amendment History
New Jersey publishes each rule’s amendment record in a “History” note beneath the rule. It is reproduced verbatim below; the “R.R.” citations refer to the former Revised Rules numbering the current rules replaced.
Source-R.R. 4:27-2(a)(b). Former rule deleted and new R. 4:23-2 adopted July 14, 1972 to be effective September 5, 1972; paragraph (b)(2); amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994; paragraph (b); amended July 5, 2000 to be effective September 5, 2000; paragraph (b)(3); amended July 12, 2002 to be effective September 3, 2002.
Plain-English Summary
A discovery order that is ignored has consequences. If a party, or its officer or designated witness, fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, the court may enter such orders as are just. The rule lists escalating options: deeming designated facts established, refusing to let the disobedient party support or oppose claims, barring evidence, striking pleadings, staying the case, dismissing the action, or entering a default judgment.
The court can also treat the disobedience as contempt, and in addition to any of these sanctions it requires the offending party to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure, unless the failure was substantially justified. This is the enforcement backbone behind a discovery order.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the sanctions for violating a discovery order?
They range from treating facts as established and barring claims or evidence, to striking pleadings, dismissing the action, entering a default judgment, or treating the violation as contempt — plus payment of the expenses and fees the failure caused.