§ 6-1440.Surety requirements on bonds.
Article 14: Uniform County Court Rules of Practice and Procedure · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 6-1440
Plain-English Summary
A bond is only as good as the person standing behind it. When a fiduciary — a guardian, conservator, or personal representative — offers a personal bond instead of one from a corporate surety, § 6-1440 requires proof that the individual surety can cover the bond if something goes wrong. That proof is a “justification of surety”: a description of the surety’s property, as exact as possible, who else owns a share of it, its value above any mortgages, liens, or exemptions, and whether it is a homestead.
The rule also carries a leftover formality from an older era of surety law: if the surety is a married woman, the bond must include a “married woman” clause. That language traces to a time when a married woman’s property rights were treated differently from a man’s, and the clause confirmed she could pledge her own property despite those older legal disabilities.
Beyond fiduciary bonds specifically, § 6-1440 gives the court a broader tool: whenever any individual — not just a fiduciary — is offered as surety on any bond in county court, the judge may require that person to justify their financial standing, under the same statutory justification requirement found in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2223. That discretion lets a court that doubts whether a proposed surety could pay decline to accept the bond until the surety proves solvency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does “justification of surety” mean under this rule?
It means the surety has to describe their property in detail — as exact a description as possible, its value above any mortgages or exemptions, any co-owners, and whether it is a homestead — so the court can judge whether the surety could cover the bond.
Who has to provide this justification?
Anyone offered as a personal (individual) surety on a fiduciary’s bond, and the court may also require it from any individual offered as surety on any other bond.
Why does the rule mention a “married woman” clause?
It is a holdover from an older body of surety law, when a married woman’s property rights were treated differently, and the clause confirmed she could pledge her own property as security.
Can the court require justification from any surety, not just on fiduciary bonds?
Yes. The rule gives the court discretion to require justification from any individual offered as surety on any bond, citing the same standard in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2223.
Does this rule apply to corporate surety bonds?
No. It addresses personal bonds offered by individual sureties; corporate sureties are vetted through their own licensure and financial oversight.
What happens if a proposed surety cannot show enough property to cover the bond?
The court can decline to accept that surety until adequate justification is shown, which may mean requiring a different surety, a corporate bond, or additional security.