§ 25-2940.Relation to federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act.
Article 29: Dispute Resolution Act and Uniform Mediation Act · Last amended 2003 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-2940
Source
Laws 2003, LB 255, § 11.
Plain-English Summary
Federal law generally lets electronic records and signatures satisfy requirements that a document be in writing or signed, under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. States can modify how that federal framework applies within their own borders, and section 25-2940 exercises that authority for Nebraska’s Uniform Mediation Act.
The section states plainly that the Uniform Mediation Act modifies, limits, or supersedes the federal act, 15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. That let Nebraska build its own rules, like the “sign” and “record” definitions in section 25-2931, around mediation without federal electronic-transactions law overriding them.
The section draws its own line, too. It does not modify, limit, or supersede 15 U.S.C. 7001(c), the federal provision protecting a consumer’s right to receive certain disclosures in a form the consumer can keep and consented to receive electronically. And it does not authorize electronic delivery of the notices Congress specifically listed in 15 U.S.C. 7003(b), covering things like wills, divorce and adoption papers, court orders, and notices about utility shutoffs, foreclosure, and insurance cancellation. Nebraska’s mediation act works within the federal framework for everything else, but leaves those consumer protections and paper-notice requirements untouched.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Nebraska’s Uniform Mediation Act override federal electronic-signature law?
In part. It modifies, limits, or supersedes the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act generally, but with two specific carve-outs.
What is one of those carve-outs?
The Nebraska act does not modify, limit, or supersede 15 U.S.C. 7001(c), the federal provision safeguarding a consumer’s right to consent to electronic delivery of certain disclosures.
What is the other carve-out?
The Nebraska act does not authorize electronic delivery of the notices listed in 15 U.S.C. 7003(b), a federal list that excludes certain notices, such as those involving wills, divorce, adoption, and court orders, from the general electronic-delivery framework.
Why does a mediation statute need to address a federal electronic-signature law at all?
Because the act’s own definitions of “record” and “sign” in section 25-2931 embrace electronic communications and signatures, and this section clarifies how that choice interacts with the federal framework already governing electronic transactions.
Does this section change how electronic signatures work outside of mediation?
No. It addresses the Uniform Mediation Act’s relationship to federal electronic-signature law specifically, not electronic signatures generally in Nebraska.