RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 25-21,243.Defendant in action involving public petition and participation; action authorized; costs, attorney's fees, and damages; authorized; waiver; section, how construed.

Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1994 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceThis section lets a defendant sued over public petitioning activity countersue for costs and attorney’s fees whenever the original suit lacked a substantial basis in fact and law, and for full compensatory damages when the suit was brought to harass, intimidate, punish, or otherwise silence the defendant.

Full Text of § 25-21,243

Text size

(1) A defendant in an action involving public petition and participation may maintain an action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim to recover damages, including costs and attorney's fees, from any person who commenced or continued such action. Costs and attorney's fees may be recovered upon a demonstration that the action involving public petition and participation was commenced or continued without a substantial basis in fact and law and could not be supported by a substantial argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. Other compensatory damages may only be recovered upon an additional demonstration that the action involving public petition and participation was commenced or continued for the purpose of harassing, intimidating, punishing, or otherwise maliciously inhibiting the free exercise of petition, speech, or association rights.
(2) The right to bring an action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim under this section may be waived only if it is waived specifically.
(3) Nothing in this section shall affect or preclude the right of any party to any recovery otherwise authorized by common law or by statute, rule, or regulation.

Source

Laws 1994, LB 665, § 3.

Plain-English Summary

Nebraska’s anti-SLAPP scheme does more than let a defendant get an unfounded suit thrown out — it also lets that defendant fight back. Section 25-21,243 gives a defendant in an action involving public petition and participation the right to bring a claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim to recover damages, including costs and attorney’s fees, from whoever commenced or continued the suit against them.

The statute builds this remedy in two tiers. Costs and attorney’s fees come first and require a lighter showing: the defendant need only demonstrate that the original suit had no substantial basis in fact and law and was not backed by a substantial argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law. Recovering other compensatory damages takes more — the defendant must additionally show the suit was commenced or continued to harass, intimidate, punish, or otherwise maliciously choke off the exercise of petition, speech, or association rights.

Two safeguards round out the section. The right to bring this countersuit can be waived, but only through a specific waiver — it does not disappear by accident or by implication. And nothing in the section cuts off any other recovery a party could otherwise pursue under the common law or under another statute, rule, or regulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can a defendant recover under this section?

Costs and attorney’s fees on a lighter showing, and full compensatory damages on a heavier one, from whoever commenced or continued the action involving public petition and participation.

What is the difference in proof needed for costs and fees versus full damages?

Costs and fees require showing the suit lacked a substantial basis in fact and law and was not supported by a substantial argument for changing existing law. Compensatory damages require that same showing plus proof the suit was brought to harass, intimidate, punish, or maliciously inhibit the defendant’s petition, speech, or association rights.

Can a defendant lose this right without meaning to?

No. The right to bring this claim can be waived only if it is waived specifically, so it survives unless the defendant gives it up in a targeted, deliberate way.

Does this section replace other claims like malicious prosecution or abuse of process?

No. The section states expressly that it does not affect or preclude any recovery otherwise available under common law or under another statute, rule, or regulation.

Who bears the burden of proof on this countersuit?

The defendant bringing the claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim under this section carries the burden of demonstrating the lack of a substantial basis, and, for compensatory damages, the improper purpose behind the original suit.

Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: anti-slapp countersuit nebraskarecover attorney fees slapp suit nebraskasuing back after slapp lawsuitdamages for meritless public participation lawsuitanti-slapp fee shifting nebraska