RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 25-21,246.Action involving public petition and participation; motion for summary judgment; when granted.

Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1994 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceThis section requires a court to grant a special motion for summary judgment in an action involving public petition and participation once the moving party shows the claim fits that category, unless the responding party shows a substantial basis in fact and law, and it requires the court to give the motion scheduling preference.

Full Text of § 25-21,246

Text size

A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the moving party has demonstrated that the action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim subject to the motion is an action involving public petition and participation unless the party responding to the motion demonstrates that the action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim has a substantial basis in fact and law or is supported by a substantial argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. The court shall grant preference in the hearing of such motion.

Source

Laws 1994, LB 665, § 6.

Plain-English Summary

Section 25-21,246 is the summary-judgment counterpart to the special motion to dismiss in section 25-21,245, and it too stands apart from Nebraska’s general-purpose summary judgment standard, section 25-1332. Under the ordinary rule, the party moving for summary judgment must show there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, based on the full evidentiary record. Here, the moving party need only show that the claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim under attack is an action involving public petition and participation.

Once that showing is made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion. That party must demonstrate that the claim has a substantial basis in fact and law — a slightly heavier showing than the law-only test in section 25-21,245, reflecting the fact that a summary judgment motion typically comes after some factual development. If the opposing party falls short, the motion must be granted; the court has no discretion to deny it once that framework plays out against the plaintiff.

As with the special motion to dismiss, the Legislature paired this motion with a scheduling command: the court shall grant preference in the hearing of the motion. That preference moves the motion ahead in the queue, so a defendant sued over public petitioning activity is not left waiting behind an ordinary civil docket to get a final ruling.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does this differ from Nebraska’s general summary judgment rule under section 25-1332?

Section 25-1332 requires the movant to show there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, based on the evidentiary record. This section instead requires the movant to show only that the claim is an action involving public petition and participation, after which the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a substantial basis in fact and law.

What must the defendant show to win this motion?

That the claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim subject to the motion is an action involving public petition and participation, as defined in section 25-21,242.

What must the plaintiff show to defeat it?

A substantial basis in fact and law for the claim, or a substantial argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law.

Why does this motion require proof of “fact and law” while the special motion to dismiss requires only “law”?

The special motion to dismiss in section 25-21,245 tests the pleadings, so it asks about a substantial basis in law alone. This motion typically follows some factual development, so the plaintiff must show a substantial basis in both fact and law to survive it.

Does the court have discretion to deny this motion if the plaintiff cannot make the required showing?

No. The statute states the motion shall be granted once the moving party establishes the claim is an action involving public petition and participation and the plaintiff fails to meet its burden.

Does this motion get any scheduling priority?

Yes. The section directs the court to grant preference in the hearing of the motion, moving it ahead of the ordinary docket.

Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: anti-slapp motion for summary judgment nebraskaspecial motion for summary judgment nebraskapublic participation lawsuit summary judgmentnebraska special msj public petitionexpedited summary judgment slapp nebraska