Rule 99.15.Execution for Delivery--How Issued and Governed.
Part III · Rule 99: Replevin · Last amended December 1, 1977 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 99.15
Amendment History
Adopted April 4, 1977, eff. Dec. 1, 1977.
Official Comment
This is substantially the same as prior Rule 99.22.
Plain-English Summary
Winning a replevin judgment is one thing; getting the property in hand is another, and Rule 99.15 supplies the enforcement tool. An execution — a formal court order directed to the sheriff — can issue once the judgment establishes who is entitled to the property. The execution has to describe the property well enough for the sheriff to identify and locate it.
The execution goes to the sheriff of the county where the property sits, which makes practical sense: that sheriff is the one positioned to locate and take the property. The sheriff's job under the execution is plain — deliver the property to whichever party the judgment says is entitled to it, whether that is the original plaintiff or a defendant who prevailed and elected to take the property back instead of its value.
This rule closes the loop that starts with the affidavit in Rule 99.03 and runs through the judgment in Rule 99.12 and the election in Rule 99.13. Once a party has made a final election to receive the property, the execution is what puts it in that party's hands.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an execution for delivery in a replevin case?
A court order to the sheriff, describing the property well enough to identify it, directing that it be delivered to the party entitled to it.
Which sheriff receives the execution?
The sheriff of the county where the property is located.
When is an execution for delivery used?
After judgment, when a party has established a right to the property, including a prevailing party who elected to receive the property under Rule 99.13.
Does the execution have to describe the property in detail?
Yes. Rule 99.15 requires the property be sufficiently described so the sheriff can identify and deliver it.
Is this a new procedure?
No. It is substantially the same as a prior version of the rule addressing execution for delivery.