RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 88.01.Presumed Child Support Amount.

Part III · Rule 88: Domestic Relations and Paternity Cases — Calculation of Child Support — Mediation — Self-Represented Litigants · Last amended January 1, 2002 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceRule 88.01 makes the amount produced by the Form No. 14 child support calculation a rebuttable presumption of the correct child support award, unless the court or agency makes a written or on-the-record finding that the calculated amount is unjust or inappropriate after weighing all relevant factors.

Full Text of Rule 88.01

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) When determining the correct amount of child support, a court or administrative agency shall consider all relevant factors, including all relevant statutory factors.
(b) There is a rebuttable presumption that the amount of child support calculated pursuant to Civil Procedure Form No. 14 is the correct amount of child support to be awarded in any judicial or administrative proceeding. Unless a request is filed pursuant to Rule 73.01(c), a written finding or a specific finding on the record by the court or administrative agency that the child support amount under a correctly calculated Form No. 14, after consideration of all relevant factors, is unjust or inappropriate shall be sufficient in a particular case to rebut the presumption that the amount of child support so calculated is correct.

Amendment History

Adopted Oct. 2, 1989, eff. April 1, 1990. Amended Dec. 19, 1997, eff. July 1, 1998; June 25, 2001, eff. Jan. 1, 2002.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 88.01 sits at the center of every Missouri child support case. It tells courts and administrative agencies how to treat the number that comes out of Civil Procedure Form No. 14, the state’s child support calculation worksheet. That number is not automatically the award. It is a presumption — a starting point the law treats as correct unless someone shows otherwise.

The rule works in two steps. First, the decision-maker considers all relevant factors bearing on child support, including the statutory factors that guide the analysis. Second, once a Form 14 amount has been correctly calculated, the rule presumes that figure is the right amount to award. A party who wants a different number has to overcome that presumption.

Overcoming it requires more than disagreement. Unless a party has filed a request under Rule 73.01(c), a written finding, or a specific finding on the record, that the Form 14 amount — after considering the relevant factors — is unjust or inappropriate is enough by itself to rebut the presumption in that case. Only then can the award depart from the calculated figure. This keeps child support predictable across cases while still leaving room for judgment when the standard formula does not fit a family’s circumstances.

Because the presumption depends on a correctly calculated Form 14, disputes under this rule often turn on the inputs feeding the worksheet — income figures, credits, and adjustments — instead of on the rule’s legal standard itself. The rule does not describe those inputs; it governs only how the resulting number is treated once it exists.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Rule 88.01 decide?

It decides how much weight the Form No. 14 child support calculation carries. It sets the calculated figure as a rebuttable presumption of the correct award instead of an automatic result.

Can a judge award a different amount than Form 14 produces?

Yes, but only after considering all relevant factors and making a written finding, or a specific finding on the record, that the calculated amount is unjust or inappropriate in that case.

Does the rule explain how to fill out Form 14?

No. Rule 88.01 governs the legal effect of a correctly calculated Form 14 amount. It does not set out the worksheet’s line items or formula.

What happens if a request is filed under Rule 73.01(c)?

Filing that request removes the shortcut described above. The rule's provision that a bare written or on-the-record finding is sufficient to rebut the presumption applies only when no such request has been filed.

Does this rule apply to administrative agencies as well as courts?

Yes. The rule applies to any judicial or administrative proceeding where child support is determined, not only court cases.

Why does Missouri use a presumption instead of a fixed formula?

A presumption keeps outcomes consistent across similar cases while still letting a court adjust the award when the calculated amount would not fit the specific family’s circumstances.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Missouri State & Federal Court Rules, adopted by the Supreme Court of Missouri. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Form 14 Missouripresumed child support amountchild support calculation Missourirebuttable presumption child supportMissouri child support guidelineschild support finding unjust or inappropriate