RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 73.01.Trial Without Jury or With An Advisory Jury--Procedure.

Part I · Rule 73: Trial by Court · Last amended January 1, 2015 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceRule 73.01 governs trials without a jury or with an advisory jury, covering how the court rules on evidence objections, a defendant's motion for judgment after the plaintiff's case, the court's authority to explain its decision and make requested findings, and whether a party must file post-trial motions.

Full Text of Rule 73.01

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

In cases tried without a jury or with an advisory jury:
(a) The court shall rule upon all objections to evidence as in jury cases. Where the evidence is ruled inadmissible, the court upon request shall take and record the evidence in full, unless it clearly appears that the evidence is not admissible on any ground or that the evidence is privileged.
(b) After the plaintiff has completed presentation of plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant may move by motion for a judgment on the grounds that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff is not entitled to relief. The filing of such motion does not constitute a waiver of defendant’s right to offer evidence.
(c) The court shall render the judgment it thinks proper under the law and the evidence.
If a party so requests, the court shall dictate to the court reporter or prepare and file a brief opinion containing a statement of the grounds for its decision and the method of deciding any damages awarded. The court may, or if requested by a party shall, include in the opinion findings on the controverted materialfact issues specified by the party. Any request for an opinion or findings of fact shall be made on the record before the introduction of evidence at trial or at such later time as the court may allow. All fact issues upon which no specific findings are made shall be considered as having been found in accordance with the result reached.
(d) Except as provided in Rule 78.07(c), a party may, but need not, file a motion for new trial or a motion to amend the judgment or opinion, or both, as provided by Rule 78.04.

Amendment History

Adopted March 29, 1974, eff. Jan. 1, 1975. Amended June 5, 1980, eff. Jan. 1, 1981; Amended June 1, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994; Amended Feb. 22, 1994, eff. Jan. 1, 1995; Amended May 28, 1996, eff. Jan. 1, 1997; Amended May 27, 1999, eff. Jan. 1, 2000; Amended June 17, 2004, eff. Jan. 1, 2005; Amended June 20, 2014, eff. Jan 1, 2015.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 73.01 is the bench-trial counterpart to the jury-trial rules, and it also covers trials with an advisory jury. The court rules on evidence objections the same way it would in a jury case, and where evidence is ruled inadmissible, the court must, on request, take and record it in full unless it's clearly inadmissible on any ground or privileged.

After the plaintiff finishes presenting evidence, the defendant may move for judgment on the ground that, under the facts and the law, the plaintiff isn't entitled to relief — and filing that motion doesn't waive the defendant's right to put on its own evidence. The court then renders the judgment it thinks proper under the law and the evidence.

If a party asks, the court must dictate to the reporter, or prepare and file, a brief opinion stating the grounds for its decision and how it decided any damages. The court may, and must if a party requests it, include findings on the controverted material fact issues the party specifies, and any request for an opinion or findings has to come on the record before evidence is introduced at trial or at a later time the court allows. Any fact issue without a specific finding is treated as decided consistent with the result reached.

Finally, except as Rule 78.07(c) provides, a party may — but doesn't have to — file a motion for new trial or a motion to amend the judgment or opinion, or both, under Rule 78.04. That makes post-trial motion practice optional after a bench trial in a way it typically isn't after a jury verdict under Rule 72.01.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an advisory jury and how does this rule treat it?

Rule 73.01 applies the bench-trial procedures to cases tried with an advisory jury as well as to cases tried without any jury at all.

Can a defendant seek judgment before presenting its own evidence in a bench trial?

Yes, after the plaintiff completes its evidence, the defendant may move for judgment on the ground that the plaintiff isn't entitled to relief under the facts and the law, without waiving its right to present evidence.

Is a trial judge required to explain the reasons for a bench-trial decision?

Only if a party requests it — the court must then dictate or file a brief opinion stating the grounds for its decision and how any damages were decided.

What happens to fact issues the judge doesn't specifically address?

They're considered as having been found in accordance with the result the court reached.

Must a party file a motion for new trial after a bench trial?

No, except as Rule 78.07(c) provides, a party may but need not file a motion for new trial or a motion to amend the judgment or opinion.

When must a party ask for a written opinion or findings of fact?

On the record before the introduction of evidence at trial, or at such later time as the court allows.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Missouri State & Federal Court Rules, adopted by the Supreme Court of Missouri. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: bench trial procedureadvisory jury trialfindings of fact by the courtmotion for judgment at close of plaintiff's evidence