Rule 79.01.Other Judge Sitting in or Assigned to Court May Perform Judge's Duties--When.
Part I · Rule 79: Assignment of Judges in Case of Disability · Last amended January 1, 1994 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 79.01
Amendment History
Adopted March 29, 1974, eff. Jan. 1, 1975. Amended Sept. 28, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994.
Official Comment
Compare: Rule 63 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is the same as prior Rule 80.01.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 79.01 addresses a scenario that Missouri's post-trial rules otherwise assume will not happen: the judge who tried the case is no longer available to finish it. That might happen because the judge left office, died, became sick, or is otherwise disabled once a verdict has been returned or findings of fact have been filed.
When that happens, the rule allows any other judge sitting in or assigned to the same court to step in and perform the duties the original judge would have handled — for example, ruling on the after-trial motions discussed throughout Rule 78. The successor judge does not need any special appointment beyond already sitting in or being assigned to that court.
The rule also recognizes that a substitute judge may not always be in a position to do the job. If the judge who steps in is satisfied that those post-verdict duties cannot be performed — whether because that judge did not preside at the trial or for some other reason — the rule permits that judge to grant a new trial instead. This gives the case a path forward even when no judge who observed the original trial remains available to rule on it.
Because this rule ties directly into the post-trial machinery of Rule 78, the successor judge exercising these powers still operates within the same deadlines and standards those rules impose, including the new-trial standard in Rule 78.01 and the ninety-day ruling deadline in Rule 78.06.
Frequently Asked Questions
What situations trigger this rule?
The original trial judge going out of office, dying, becoming sick, or otherwise being unable to perform post-verdict duties after a verdict is returned or findings of fact are filed.
Who can step in to perform the unfinished duties?
Any other judge sitting in or assigned to the court in which the action was tried.
What can the successor judge do if the trial-related duties cannot be performed?
If satisfied that those duties cannot be performed, whether because that judge did not preside at trial or for another reason, the successor judge may grant a new trial.
Does the successor judge need special authorization beyond sitting in or being assigned to the court?
No, the rule's text does not require anything beyond the judge already sitting in or being assigned to that court.
Does this rule apply before a verdict is returned?
The rule is framed around duties to be performed after a verdict is returned or findings of fact are filed, so it addresses the post-verdict stage of the case.
How does this rule interact with the ninety-day deadline in Rule 78.06?
The successor judge exercising duties under this rule is still operating within the same after-trial motion framework, including the ninety-day deadline that rule imposes for ruling on such motions.