Rule 78.10.Additur and Remittitur.
Part I · Rule 78: New Trials—After-Trial Motions—Preservation of Error · Last amended July 1, 2008 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 78.10
Amendment History
Adopted June 5, 1980, eff. Jan. 1, 1981. Amended Dec. 18, 2007, eff. July 1, 2008.
Official Comment
This is new.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 78.10 covers what happens when a court decides a jury's damage award is too low (calling for additur) or too high (calling for remittitur) instead of granting an outright new trial on damages. It lays out the full sequence from the initial motion through any appellate involvement.
Subsection (a) sets the filing deadline: a motion for additur or remittitur must be filed within the same time Rule 78.04 gives for filing a motion for new trial. Subsection (b) then describes what happens if the trial court grants the motion, in whole or in part. The order must give the party opposing the relief the option to elect a new trial instead, and that election must be filed within thirty days of the order. The order itself must specify whether any resulting new trial would cover damages only or all issues. If the opposing party does not make a timely election, it is deemed to have accepted the additur or remittitur, and the trial court then amends the judgment to reflect it.
Subsection (c) extends the process to the appellate level. A party that asked for additur or remittitur in the trial court but received less than the full relief it wanted may renew that request on appeal. If the appellate court grants more relief, it must likewise give the opposing party the option to elect a new trial in the circuit court, with the election due within thirty days of the appellate mandate, and the appellate decision must specify whether the new trial covers damages or all issues. The same accept-by-default rule applies: no timely election means acceptance, and the trial court amends the judgment.
Subsection (d) protects a party who consents to additur or remittitur from being trapped by that consent — it may still argue on appeal that the original verdict was proper, or that the additur or remittitur was excessive, though it cannot use that argument to initiate its own appeal; it can only raise the point on the other party's appeal. Subsection (e) closes the rule with the same one-time limit that governs new trials under Rule 78.02: neither the trial court nor the appellate court may award additur or remittitur more than once on the ground that damages are against the weight of the evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to move for additur or remittitur?
The same time period Rule 78.04 provides for filing a motion for new trial.
What choice does the party opposing additur or remittitur get if the trial court grants the motion?
The option to elect a new trial instead of accepting the adjustment, and that election must be filed within thirty days of the order.
What happens if the opposing party does not elect a new trial in time?
It is deemed to have accepted the additur or remittitur, and the trial court promptly amends the judgment to conform to it.
Can a party ask an appellate court for more additur or remittitur than the trial court gave?
Yes, if the party requested it below and received less than the full relief sought, it may renew the request on appeal under subsection (c).
Does agreeing to additur or remittitur waive the right to challenge it on appeal?
Not entirely. A consenting party can still argue on the other party's appeal that the original verdict was proper or that the adjustment was excessive, though it cannot use that argument to start its own appeal.
Is there a limit on how many times additur or remittitur can be awarded on the same ground?
Yes, subsection (e) provides that neither the trial court nor the appellate court may award it more than once on the ground that damages are against the weight of the evidence.