Rule 12.Defenses and Objections; When and How Presented; By Pleading or Motion; Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
Last amended January 1, 2020 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 12
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment--1993 Amendments
The only change made to this rule is to correct a typographical or grammatical error in the existing rule. No change in meaning or interpretation is intended.
Advisory Committee Comment—2020 Amendments
Rule 12.01 is amended as part of the amendments made to the timing provisions of the rules. These amendments implement the adoption of a standard “day” for counting deadlines under the rules—counting all days regardless of the length of the period and standardizing the time periods, where practicable, to a 7-, 14-, 21- or 28-day schedule. The changes to this rule change only the time limits, and are not intended to have any other effect. Rule 12.05 is amended as part of the amendments made to the timing provisions of the rules. These amendments implement the adoption of a standard “day” for counting deadlines under the rules—counting all days regardless of the length of the period and standardizing the time periods, where practicable, to a 7-, 14-, 21- or 28-day schedule. The only change to this rule lengthens the 10-day period to respond to an order under the rule to 14 days. This changes only the time limit, and is not intended to have any other effect. Rule 12.06 is amended as part of the amendments made to the timing provisions of the rules. These amendments implement the adoption of a standard “day” for counting deadlines under the rules—counting all days regardless of the length of the period and standardizing the time periods, where practicable, to a 7-, 14-, 21- or 28-day schedule. The only change to this rule lengthens the 20-day period to file a motion to strike to 21 days. This changes only the time limit to make it consistent with the deadline to answer contained in Rule 12.01, and is not intended to have any other effect.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective January 1, 2020.)
- (Amended effective March 1, 1994.)
- (Amended effective January 1, 2020.)
- (Amended effective January 1, 2020.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 12.01 requires a defendant to serve an answer within 21 days after service of the summons, unless the court directs otherwise under Rule 4.043, and sets matching 21-day deadlines for a reply to a counterclaim and an answer to a cross-claim. Rule 12.02 lists the defenses a party may raise by motion instead of in the responsive pleading itself: lack of subject-matter or personal jurisdiction, insufficient process or service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and failure to join a party under Rule 19. A motion raising any of these must be made before the responsive pleading, if a further pleading is allowed, and if matters outside the pleadings are presented on a failure-to-state-a-claim motion, the court treats it as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56.
Rule 12.03 allows a motion for judgment on the pleadings after the pleadings close, and Rule 12.04 requires the defenses listed in Rules 12.02 and 12.03 to be heard and decided before trial unless the court orders a deferral. Rule 12.05 lets a party move for a more definite statement when a pleading is so vague or ambiguous that a response is hard to frame, and Rule 12.06 lets a party move to strike an insufficient defense or immaterial matter, generally within 21 days after service of the pleading being attacked.
Rule 12.08 sets the stakes for delay: a defense of lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, or insufficient service of process is waived if it is left out of an available Rule 12 motion or, where no such motion is made, out of the responsive pleading or an amendment allowed as a matter of course. Failure to state a claim, failure to join an indispensable party under Rule 19, and failure to state a legal defense, by contrast, may be raised as late as the trial on the merits. A court that lacks subject-matter jurisdiction must dismiss the action whenever that becomes apparent, at any stage.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many days does a defendant have to answer a Minnesota complaint?
21 days after service of the summons, unless the court orders otherwise under Rule 4.043.
What defenses can be raised by a motion to dismiss instead of in the answer?
Rule 12.02 lists six: lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, insufficient service of process, failure to state a claim, and failure to join a party under Rule 19.
Do I lose a defense if I do not raise it right away?
It depends which one. Under Rule 12.08, defenses of personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, and insufficient service of process are waived if not raised in an available motion or the responsive pleading. Failure to state a claim and failure to join an indispensable party can still be raised as late as trial.
Advisory Committee Comment—2018 Amendments
Rule 12.01 establishes the time to respond to a complaint. In 2017 the Minnesota Legislature adopted a statute that extends the time to respond to certain actions relating to architectural barriers to public access to buildings. See Minn. Laws 2017, ch. 80, §§ 7 & 3, to be codified as Minn. Stat. § 363A.331, subds. 2 & 2a. The statute applies to actions brought on or after May 24, 2017.