RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.955.Sentencing or Disposition in Designated Cases

Subchapter 3.900 — Proceedings Involving Juveniles · Last verified September 5, 2026

In one sentenceMCR 3.955 tells the family division how to choose between an order of disposition and an adult sentence after a conviction in a designated case, and how to delay imposition of sentence instead.

Full Text of Rule 3.955

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

(A) Determining Whether to Sentence or Impose Disposition. If a juvenile is convicted under MCL 712A.2d, sentencing or disposition shall be made as provided in MCL 712A.18(1)(o) and the Crime Victim's Rights Act, MCL 780.751 et seq., if applicable. In deciding whether to enter an order of disposition, or impose or delay imposition of sentence, the court shall consider all the following factors, giving greater weight to the seriousness of the offense and the juvenile's prior record:
(1) the seriousness of the alleged offense in terms of community protection, including but not limited to, the existence of any aggravating factors recognized by the sentencing guidelines, the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, and the effect on any victim;
(2) the culpability of the juvenile in committing the alleged offense, including, but not limited to, the level of the juvenile's participation in planning and carrying out the offense and the existence of any aggravating or mitigating factors recognized by the sentencing guidelines;
(3) the juvenile's prior record of delinquency including, but not limited to, any record of detention, any police record, any school record, or any other evidence indicating prior delinquent behavior;
(4) the juvenile's programming history, including, but not limited to, the juvenile's past willingness to participate meaningfully in available programming;
(5) the adequacy of the punishment or programming available in the juvenile justice system; and
(6) the dispositional options available for the juvenile.
The court also shall give the juvenile, the juvenile's lawyer, the prosecutor, and the victim an opportunity to advise the court of any circumstances they believe the court should consider in deciding whether to enter an order of disposition or to impose or delay imposition of sentence.
(B) Burden of Proof. After the court has considered the results of the risk and needs assessment pursuant to MCR 3.907, the court shall enter an order of disposition unless the court determines that the best interests of the public would be served by sentencing the juvenile as an adult. The prosecuting attorney has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that, on the basis of the criteria in subrule (A), it would be in the best interests of the public to sentence the juvenile as an adult.
(C) Sentencing. If the court determines that the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, either initially or following a delayed imposition of sentence, the sentencing hearing shall be held in accordance with the procedures set forth in MCR 6.425, including the procedures of MCR 6.425(G) for appointing appellate counsel.
(D) Delayed Imposition of Sentence. If the court determines that the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, the court may, in its discretion, enter an order of disposition delaying imposition of sentence and placing the juvenile on probation on such terms and conditions as it considers appropriate, including ordering any disposition under MCL 712A.18. A delayed sentence may be imposed in accordance with MCR 3.956.
(E) Disposition Hearing. If the court does not determine that the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, the court shall hold a dispositional hearing and comply with the procedures set forth in MCR 3.943. Requests for and appointment of appellate counsel are subject to the procedures in MCR 3.993(D).
End

Plain-English Summary

MCR 3.955 is the fork in the road at the end of a designated case. A juvenile convicted under MCL 712A.2d faces either an order of disposition or a sentence, and this rule fixes the default, the burden, and the factors that decide which one.

The factors

Subrule (A) points sentencing or disposition to MCL 712A.18(1)(o) and, where it applies, to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, MCL 780.751 et seq. It then lists six factors the court must consider, weighting the seriousness of the offense and the juvenile's prior record above the rest:

  • The seriousness of the offense in terms of community protection, including aggravating factors recognized by the sentencing guidelines, the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, and the effect on any victim.
  • The juvenile's culpability, including the level of participation in planning and carrying out the offense and any aggravating or mitigating factors recognized by the sentencing guidelines.
  • The prior record of delinquency, including any record of detention, police record, school record, or other evidence of prior delinquent behavior.
  • The juvenile's programming history, including past willingness to participate meaningfully in available programming.
  • The adequacy of the punishment or programming available in the juvenile justice system.
  • The dispositional options available for the juvenile.

Subrule (A) also requires the court to give the juvenile, the juvenile's lawyer, the prosecutor, and the victim an opportunity to raise circumstances they believe the court should weigh.

The default and who has to overcome it

Subrule (B) sets the tilt. After the court has considered the results of the risk and needs assessment under MCR 3.907, it enters an order of disposition unless it determines that the best interests of the public would be served by sentencing the juvenile as an adult. The prosecuting attorney carries the burden of proving that by a preponderance of the evidence, measured against the criteria in subrule (A).

Three paths out

  • Sentence. Under subrule (C), where the court decides the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, either at the outset or after a delayed imposition of sentence, the sentencing hearing follows MCR 6.425, including the procedures in MCR 6.425(G) for appointing appellate counsel.
  • Delayed imposition of sentence. Subrule (D) applies where the court has determined that the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, and lets it instead enter, in its discretion, an order of disposition that delays imposition of sentence and places the juvenile on probation on terms it considers appropriate, including any disposition under MCL 712A.18. The delayed sentence may later be imposed under MCR 3.956.
  • Disposition. If the court does not determine that the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, subrule (E) requires a dispositional hearing following MCR 3.943, with requests for and appointment of appellate counsel handled under MCR 3.993(D).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a juvenile convicted in a designated case automatically sentenced as an adult?

No. Subrule (B) makes an order of disposition the default. The court enters one unless it determines that the best interests of the public would be served by sentencing the juvenile as an adult.

Who has the burden of proof on adult sentencing in a designated case?

The prosecuting attorney, under subrule (B). The burden is a preponderance of the evidence that sentencing the juvenile as an adult would serve the best interests of the public, judged on the criteria in subrule (A).

What is a delayed imposition of sentence under MCR 3.955?

Subrule (D) allows the court, after deciding the juvenile should be sentenced as an adult, to enter an order of disposition that delays imposition of sentence and places the juvenile on probation on terms it considers appropriate, including any disposition under MCL 712A.18.

The sentence held back that way may be imposed later in accordance with MCR 3.956.

Does the victim get to be heard before the court chooses between disposition and sentence?

Yes. Subrule (A) requires the court to give the juvenile, the juvenile's lawyer, the prosecutor, and the victim an opportunity to advise it of circumstances they believe it should consider.

Does the risk and needs assessment affect the decision?

Subrule (B) has the court act after it has considered the results of the risk and needs assessment under MCR 3.907.

Which factors carry the most weight in choosing between disposition and sentence?

Subrule (A) lists six factors and directs the court to give greater weight to the seriousness of the offense and the juvenile's prior record.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 3 (Special Proceedings and Actions), as published by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office, current through September 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Mich. Const. 1963, art. VI, § 5). Last verified September 5, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: designated case sentencingsentenced as an adultdelayed imposition of sentenceorder of dispositionjuvenile probationbest interests of the publicmcr 3.955