RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.717.Dismissals

Subchapter 3.700 — Personal Protection and Extreme Risk Protection Proceedings · Last verified September 5, 2026

In one sentenceMCR 3.717 allows an extreme risk protection action to be dismissed only on the petitioner's motion before an order issues, with no fee, subject to exceptions in MCR 3.718 and MCR 3.720 and to dismissals otherwise permitted by law.

Full Text of Rule 3.717

Text size

Except as specified in MCR 3.718(B), MCR 3.718(D), and MCR 3.720, an action for an extreme risk protection order may only be dismissed upon motion by the petitioner prior to the issuance of an order. There is no fee for such a motion. This rule does not preclude a dismissal as otherwise permitted by law.
End

Plain-English Summary

MCR 3.717 is three sentences long, and it draws a narrow gate. An action for an extreme risk protection order may be dismissed only on a motion by the petitioner, and only before an order issues. There is no fee for that motion. The rule then names three carve-outs and preserves any dismissal otherwise permitted by law.

The timing limit

The words to watch are prior to the issuance of an order. Once an extreme risk protection order exists, the petitioner's voluntary dismissal is no longer the tool that ends it. Relief from an issued order runs through MCR 3.720, which is one of the rules the exception clause names, and which sets out who may move to modify or terminate an order and what the moving party must prove.

The three exceptions

  • MCR 3.718(B) covers immediate emergency ex parte orders that a law enforcement officer requests verbally. That rule sets the steps the officer must take afterward, and directs the court, unless good cause is shown, to terminate the order, order that the respondent may reclaim any seized firearms subject to MCL 691.1815, and dismiss the case if the officer does not file within one business day.
  • MCR 3.718(D) governs hearings, and it says when the court may dismiss the complaint at that stage rather than adjourn and reschedule.
  • MCR 3.720 covers modification, termination, and extension of an issued order.

What the last sentence preserves

The closing line states that the rule does not preclude a dismissal as otherwise permitted by law. MCR 3.717 is a limit on voluntary dismissal by agreement or by a respondent's request, not a repeal of every other ground on which a case can end. Read together, the pieces keep control of an unresolved case with the person who filed it, and shift control of a resolved one to the rule that governs the order itself.

The no-fee provision matters in practice. A petitioner who decides not to pursue the matter is not charged for stepping away, and the exception clause makes clear that the court retains its own paths to ending a case in the situations the named rules cover.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a respondent move to dismiss an extreme risk protection action?

MCR 3.717 allows dismissal only upon motion by the petitioner prior to the issuance of an order, except as specified in MCR 3.718(B), MCR 3.718(D), and MCR 3.720. The rule also states that it does not preclude a dismissal as otherwise permitted by law.

Is there a fee to dismiss an extreme risk protection action?

No. The rule states there is no fee for a motion to dismiss the action.

Can the petitioner dismiss after the order has already been entered?

The rule limits the petitioner's dismissal to the period prior to the issuance of an order. MCR 3.720, one of the rules the exception clause names, governs modification and termination of an order that has issued.

Which rules override the petitioner-only dismissal limit?

MCR 3.717 names three: MCR 3.718(B), which covers immediate emergency ex parte orders; MCR 3.718(D), which covers hearings; and MCR 3.720, which covers modification, termination, and extension of an issued order.

Can a case be dismissed if the petitioner does not show up for the hearing?

Yes, under the MCR 3.718(D) exception. That rule provides that if the petitioner fails to attend the hearing, the court may adjourn and reschedule the hearing or dismiss the complaint.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 3 (Special Proceedings and Actions), as published by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office, current through September 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Mich. Const. 1963, art. VI, § 5). Last verified September 5, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: erpo dismissaldismiss extreme risk protection ordervoluntary dismissalred flag dismissalno fee motion