RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.705.Issuance of Personal Protection Orders

Subchapter 3.700 — Personal Protection and Extreme Risk Protection Proceedings · Last verified September 5, 2026

In one sentenceMCR 3.705 sets the standard and timing for ex parte personal protection orders, governs hearings when no ex parte order is entered, and bars internet publication that would reveal a protected party's identity or location.

Full Text of Rule 3.705

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C)

(A) Ex Parte Orders.
(1) The court must rule on a request for an ex parte order within one business day of the filing date of the petition.
(2) If it clearly appears from specific facts shown by verified complaint, written petition, or affidavit that the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought, an ex parte order shall be granted if immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay required to effectuate notice or that the notice will itself precipitate adverse action before a personal protection order can be issued. In a proceeding under MCL 600.2950a, the court must state in writing the specific reasons for issuance of the order. A permanent record or memorandum must be made of any nonwritten evidence, argument or other representations made in support of issuance of an ex parte order.
(3) An ex parte order is valid for not less than 182 days, and must state its expiration date.
(4) If an ex parte order is entered, the petitioner shall serve the petition and order as provided in MCR 3.706(D). However, failure to make service does not affect the order's validity or effectiveness.
(5) If the court refuses to grant an ex parte order, it shall state the reasons in writing and shall advise the petitioner of the right to request a hearing as provided in subrule (B). If the petitioner does not request a hearing within 21 days of entry of the order, the order denying the petition is final. The court shall not be required to give such notice if the court determines after interviewing the petitioner that the petitioner's claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing.
(B) Hearings.
(1) The court shall schedule a hearing as soon as possible in the following instances, unless it determines after interviewing the petitioner that the claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing:
(a) the petition does not request an ex parte order; or
(b) the court refuses to enter an ex parte order and the petitioner subsequently requests a hearing.
(2) The petitioner shall serve on the respondent notice of the hearing along with the petition as provided in MCR 2.105(A). If the respondent is a minor, and the where-abouts of the respondent's parent or parents, guardian, or custodian is known, the petitioner shall also in the same manner serve notice of the hearing and the petition on the respondent's parent or parents, guardian, or custodian. One day before the hearing on a petition seeking a PPO under MCL 600.2950 or MCL 600.2950a(1) is deemed sufficient notice. Two days before the hearing on a petition seeking a PPO under MCL 600.2950a(2) is deemed sufficient notice.
(3) The hearing shall be held on the record. In accordance with MCR 2.407, the court may allow the use of videoconferencing technology by any participant as defined in MCR 2.407(A)(1).
(4) The petitioner must attend the hearing. If the petitioner fails to attend the hearing, the court may adjourn and reschedule the hearing or dismiss the petition.
(5) If the respondent fails to appear at a hearing on the petition and the court determines the petitioner made diligent attempts to serve the respondent, whether the respondent was served or not, the order may be entered without further notice to the respondent if the court determines that the petitioner is entitled to relief.
(6) At the conclusion of the hearing the court must state the reasons for granting or denying a personal protection order on the record and enter an appropriate order. In addition, the court must state the reasons for denying a personal protection order in writing, and, in a proceeding under MCL 600.2950a, the court must state in writing the specific reasons for issuance of the order.
(C) Pursuant to 18 USC 2265(d)(3), a court is prohibited from making available to the public on the Internet any information regarding the registration of, filing of a petition for, or issuance of an order under this rule if such publication would be likely to publicly reveal the identity or location of the party protected under the order.
End

Plain-English Summary

MCR 3.705 is where a personal protection petition turns into a decision. It handles two paths — an order entered without notice, and an order entered after a hearing — and puts a deadline on each.

Ex parte orders

Subrule (A)(1) gives the court one business day from the filing date of the petition to rule on a request for an ex parte order. Subrule (A)(2) sets the standard: if it clearly appears from specific facts shown by verified complaint, written petition, or affidavit that the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought, the order shall be granted where immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay required to effectuate notice, or where notice will itself precipitate adverse action before an order can be issued. In a proceeding under MCL 600.2950a, the court must state in writing the specific reasons for issuing the order. A permanent record or memorandum must be made of any nonwritten evidence, argument, or other representations offered in support.

Subrule (A)(3) requires an ex parte order to run for not less than 182 days and to state its expiration date on its face. Subrule (A)(4) directs the petitioner to serve the petition and order as provided in MCR 3.706(D), then adds a point that catches many readers off guard: failure to make service does not affect the order's validity or effectiveness.

When the court says no

Subrule (A)(5) requires a court refusing an ex parte order to state its reasons in writing and to advise the petitioner of the right to request a hearing under subrule (B). If no hearing is requested within 21 days of entry of the order, the order denying the petition is final. The notice requirement drops away if the court determines, after interviewing the petitioner, that the claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing.

Hearings

Subrule (B)(1) requires the court to schedule a hearing as soon as possible in two situations, subject to that same without merit determination: where the petition does not request an ex parte order, and where the court refuses an ex parte order and the petitioner then asks for a hearing. Notice of the hearing goes to the respondent with the petition under MCR 2.105(A), and to a minor respondent's parent, guardian, or custodian when their whereabouts are known. The rule then sets what counts as enough lead time:

  • One day before the hearing is sufficient notice for a petition seeking an order under MCL 600.2950 or MCL 600.2950a(1).
  • Two days before the hearing is sufficient notice for a petition seeking an order under MCL 600.2950a(2).

Hearings are held on the record, and under MCR 2.407 the court may allow a participant to appear by videoconferencing technology. Subrule (B)(4) requires the petitioner to attend, and allows the court to adjourn and reschedule or to dismiss the petition if the petitioner does not. Subrule (B)(5) permits entry of an order without further notice where the respondent fails to appear and the court finds diligent attempts at service were made, served or not, and that the petitioner is entitled to relief. Subrule (B)(6) requires reasons on the record either way, reasons in writing for a denial, and written specific reasons for issuance in a proceeding under MCL 600.2950a.

Publication

Subrule (C) prohibits a court, under 18 USC 2265(d)(3), from posting on the internet any information about the registration, petition, or issuance of an order if publication would likely reveal the protected party's identity or location.

Frequently Asked Questions

How fast must a Michigan court rule on an ex parte PPO request?

Subrule (A)(1) gives the court one business day from the filing date of the petition to rule on a request for an ex parte order.

How long does an ex parte personal protection order last?

Subrule (A)(3) requires an ex parte order to be valid for not less than 182 days, and requires it to state its expiration date.

What happens if the court refuses to enter an ex parte PPO?

Under subrule (A)(5) the court states its reasons in writing and advises the petitioner of the right to request a hearing under subrule (B). If the petitioner does not request a hearing within 21 days of entry of the order, the order denying the petition is final.

That notice is not required if the court determines after interviewing the petitioner that the claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing.

How much notice of a PPO hearing does a respondent get?

Subrule (B)(2) treats one day before the hearing as sufficient notice on a petition seeking an order under MCL 600.2950 or MCL 600.2950a(1), and two days before the hearing as sufficient on a petition under MCL 600.2950a(2). Notice of the hearing is served with the petition as provided in MCR 2.105(A).

Does an ex parte PPO fail if the respondent is never served?

No. Subrule (A)(4) directs the petitioner to serve the petition and order as provided in MCR 3.706(D), and then states that failure to make service does not affect the order's validity or effectiveness.

What happens if the petitioner does not show up for the PPO hearing?

Subrule (B)(4) requires the petitioner to attend. If the petitioner fails to attend, the court may adjourn and reschedule the hearing or dismiss the petition.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 3 (Special Proceedings and Actions), as published by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office, current through September 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Mich. Const. 1963, art. VI, § 5). Last verified September 5, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: ex parte ppoppo hearing182 day ppoissuance of personal protection orderppo denied request hearingone business day ppo