Rule 3.705.Issuance of Personal Protection Orders
Subchapter 3.700 — Personal Protection and Extreme Risk Protection Proceedings · Last verified September 5, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.705
Plain-English Summary
MCR 3.705 is where a personal protection petition turns into a decision. It handles two paths — an order entered without notice, and an order entered after a hearing — and puts a deadline on each.
Ex parte orders
Subrule (A)(1) gives the court one business day from the filing date of the petition to rule on a request for an ex parte order. Subrule (A)(2) sets the standard: if it clearly appears from specific facts shown by verified complaint, written petition, or affidavit that the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought, the order shall be granted where immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay required to effectuate notice, or where notice will itself precipitate adverse action before an order can be issued. In a proceeding under MCL 600.2950a, the court must state in writing the specific reasons for issuing the order. A permanent record or memorandum must be made of any nonwritten evidence, argument, or other representations offered in support.
Subrule (A)(3) requires an ex parte order to run for not less than 182 days and to state its expiration date on its face. Subrule (A)(4) directs the petitioner to serve the petition and order as provided in MCR 3.706(D), then adds a point that catches many readers off guard: failure to make service does not affect the order's validity or effectiveness.
When the court says no
Subrule (A)(5) requires a court refusing an ex parte order to state its reasons in writing and to advise the petitioner of the right to request a hearing under subrule (B). If no hearing is requested within 21 days of entry of the order, the order denying the petition is final. The notice requirement drops away if the court determines, after interviewing the petitioner, that the claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing.
Hearings
Subrule (B)(1) requires the court to schedule a hearing as soon as possible in two situations, subject to that same without merit determination: where the petition does not request an ex parte order, and where the court refuses an ex parte order and the petitioner then asks for a hearing. Notice of the hearing goes to the respondent with the petition under MCR 2.105(A), and to a minor respondent's parent, guardian, or custodian when their whereabouts are known. The rule then sets what counts as enough lead time:
- One day before the hearing is sufficient notice for a petition seeking an order under MCL 600.2950 or MCL 600.2950a(1).
- Two days before the hearing is sufficient notice for a petition seeking an order under MCL 600.2950a(2).
Hearings are held on the record, and under MCR 2.407 the court may allow a participant to appear by videoconferencing technology. Subrule (B)(4) requires the petitioner to attend, and allows the court to adjourn and reschedule or to dismiss the petition if the petitioner does not. Subrule (B)(5) permits entry of an order without further notice where the respondent fails to appear and the court finds diligent attempts at service were made, served or not, and that the petitioner is entitled to relief. Subrule (B)(6) requires reasons on the record either way, reasons in writing for a denial, and written specific reasons for issuance in a proceeding under MCL 600.2950a.
Publication
Subrule (C) prohibits a court, under 18 USC 2265(d)(3), from posting on the internet any information about the registration, petition, or issuance of an order if publication would likely reveal the protected party's identity or location.
Frequently Asked Questions
How fast must a Michigan court rule on an ex parte PPO request?
Subrule (A)(1) gives the court one business day from the filing date of the petition to rule on a request for an ex parte order.
How long does an ex parte personal protection order last?
Subrule (A)(3) requires an ex parte order to be valid for not less than 182 days, and requires it to state its expiration date.
What happens if the court refuses to enter an ex parte PPO?
Under subrule (A)(5) the court states its reasons in writing and advises the petitioner of the right to request a hearing under subrule (B). If the petitioner does not request a hearing within 21 days of entry of the order, the order denying the petition is final.
That notice is not required if the court determines after interviewing the petitioner that the claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing.
How much notice of a PPO hearing does a respondent get?
Subrule (B)(2) treats one day before the hearing as sufficient notice on a petition seeking an order under MCL 600.2950 or MCL 600.2950a(1), and two days before the hearing as sufficient on a petition under MCL 600.2950a(2). Notice of the hearing is served with the petition as provided in MCR 2.105(A).
Does an ex parte PPO fail if the respondent is never served?
No. Subrule (A)(4) directs the petitioner to serve the petition and order as provided in MCR 3.706(D), and then states that failure to make service does not affect the order's validity or effectiveness.
What happens if the petitioner does not show up for the PPO hearing?
Subrule (B)(4) requires the petitioner to attend. If the petitioner fails to attend, the court may adjourn and reschedule the hearing or dismiss the petition.