Rule 3.604.Bonds
Subchapter 3.600 — Miscellaneous Proceedings · Last verified September 5, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.604
Plain-English Summary
MCR 3.604 is the general bond rule. Subrule (A) applies it to bonds given under the Michigan Court Rules and the Revised Judicature Act unless a rule or statute clearly calls for a different procedure. Its effect is to make a bond enforceable inside the case that produced it.
The surety comes into the case
Subrule (B) is the hinge. A surety on a bond or undertaking given under the court rules or the Revised Judicature Act submits to the court's jurisdiction and consents that further proceedings affecting the surety's liability may be conducted under this rule. Subrule (C) adds a substitution requirement: if the only plaintiff or the only defendant dies during the action, each surety on a bond given by that party is made a party, on notice under MCR 2.107, in addition to the parties substituted under MCR 2.202.
Proving the surety is good for it
Subrule (D)(1) requires a surety other than a surety company authorized to do business in Michigan to execute an affidavit of pecuniary responsibility and attach it to the bond. Subrule (D)(2) sets the measure: assets not exempt from execution with a fair market value exceeding the surety's liabilities by at least twice the amount of the bond. A copy of the bond and affidavit must be promptly served on the party for whose benefit it was given under MCR 2.107, with proof of service promptly filed. In a medical malpractice action filed on or after October 1, 1986, subrule (D)(4) routes notice of the filing of security for costs, or of the affidavit in lieu of that security, required by MCL 600.2912d and MCL 600.2912e, through MCR 2.109(B). Under subrule (G), a surety company certified by the Commissioner of Insurance as authorized to do business in Michigan may act as surety on a bond.
Objecting to a surety
Subrule (E) gives the party for whose benefit the bond is given 7 days after receipt of a copy to serve a notice objecting to the sufficiency of the surety on the officer taking the bond and the party giving it. Failure to do so waives all objections to the surety. Subrule (F) turns that notice into a motion. On the objecting party's demand, the surety must appear at the hearing and submit to examination on pecuniary responsibility or the validity of the execution of the bond, and the court may then approve or reject the bond or require an amended, substitute, or additional bond. Subrule (F)(3) addresses an objection in an appeal to the circuit court from a lower court or tribunal.
Enforcement and relief
- Subrule (H): when the condition of a bond is broken, or the circumstances require, the court directs delivery or assignment of the bond for prosecution to the person it benefits, and enforcement proceedings may be taken in the action under subrule (I).
- Subrule (I)(1): judgment may be entered directly against the surety or the security on motion, without an independent action, on a showing that the condition giving rise to liability or forfeiture has occurred.
- Subrule (I)(3): if later proceedings show the surety is not liable or that the security should not have been forfeited, the court may order restitution.
- Subrule (L): where a party required to give a bond for supersedeas, appeal, or otherwise is unable to give it by reason of poverty, the court may, on proof of the inability, limit or eliminate the requirement for surety on appropriate conditions and for a reasonable time.
Subrule (J) blocks judge shopping. Once a circuit judge has denied an application for supersedeas in whole or in part, or granted it conditionally or on terms, a later application for the same purpose in the same matter may not be made to another circuit judge while the first is available. An order entered contrary to that provision is void, must be revoked by the judge who entered it, and exposes the applicant to punishment for contempt.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who has to file an affidavit of pecuniary responsibility on a Michigan bond?
Subrule (D)(1) requires it of every surety on a bond except a surety company authorized to do business in Michigan. The affidavit is executed by the surety and attached to the bond.
Subrule (D)(2) sets what the surety must affirm: ownership of assets not exempt from execution having a fair market value that exceeds the surety's liabilities by at least twice the amount of the bond.
How long do you have to object to a surety in Michigan?
Subrule (E) gives the party for whose benefit the bond is given 7 days after receipt of a copy of the bond. Within that period the party serves notice of an objection to the sufficiency of the surety on the officer taking the bond and on the party giving the bond.
Missing the window has a consequence: failure to serve the notice waives all objections to the surety.
Can a judgment be entered against a surety without filing a separate lawsuit?
Yes. Subrule (I)(1) allows judgment to be entered directly against the surety or the security on motion, without the necessity of an independent action, on a showing that the condition has occurred giving rise to liability on the bond or to forfeiture of the security.
That works because subrule (B) treats the surety as having submitted to the court's jurisdiction and consented to further proceedings on the bond under this rule. Notice of the hearing must be given under MCR 2.107 and may be mailed to the address stated in the bond or given when the security was furnished, unless the surety or owner has given notice of a change of address.
What happens if a party cannot afford a required bond?
Subrule (L) addresses it. A party required to give a bond for supersedeas, appeal, or otherwise who is unable to do so by reason of poverty may, on proof of the inability, ask the court to limit or eliminate the requirement for surety on the bond.
Relief comes on appropriate conditions and for a reasonable time.
Can a party ask a second judge for supersedeas after the first judge says no?
Subrule (J)(1) says no while the first judge is available. Once a circuit judge has denied an application for supersedeas in whole or in part, or granted it conditionally or on terms, a later application for the same purpose in the same matter may not be made to another circuit judge.
Subrule (J)(2) backs that up. An order entered contrary to the rule is void and must be revoked by the judge who entered it on proof of the facts, and the person who made the later application is subject to punishment for contempt.
What if it turns out later that the surety was not liable?
Subrule (I)(3) allows correction. If later proceedings in the action, on appeal or otherwise, determine that the surety is not liable or that the security should not have been forfeited, the court may order restitution of the money paid or the security forfeited.