RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.411.Civil Action to Determine Interests in Land

Subchapter 3.400 — Proceedings Involving Real Property · Last verified September 5, 2026

In one sentenceMCR 3.411 governs civil actions to determine interests in land under MCL 600.2932, covering how the land and the competing claims are pleaded, how title evidence is disclosed, and how the court resolves claims for the value of the use of the premises and for improvements.

Full Text of Rule 3.411

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I)

(A) This rule applies to actions to determine interests in land under MCL 600.2932. It does not apply to summary proceedings to recover possession of premises under MCL 600.5701- 600.5759.
(B) Complaint.
(1) The complaint must describe the land in question with reasonable certainty by stating
(a) the section, township, and range of the premises;
(b) the number of the block and lot of the premises; or
(c) another description of the premises sufficiently clear so that the premises may be identified.
(2) The complaint must allege
(a) the interest the plaintiff claims in the premises;
(b) the interest the defendant claims in the premises; and
(c) the facts establishing the superiority of the plaintiff's claim.
(C) Written Evidence of Title to be Referred to in Pleadings.
(1) Written evidence of title may not be introduced at trial unless it has been sufficiently referred to in the pleadings in accordance with this rule.
(2) The plaintiff must attach to the complaint, and the defendant must attach to the answer, a statement of the title on which the pleader relies, showing from whom the title was obtained and the page and book where it appears of record.
(3) Within a reasonable time after demand for it, a party must furnish to the adverse party a copy of an unrecorded conveyance on which he or she relies or give a satisfactory reason for not doing so.
(4) References to title may be amended or made more specific in accordance with the general rules regarding amendments and motions for more definite statement.
(D) Findings As to Rights in and Title to Premises.
(1) After evidence has been taken, the court shall make findings determining the disputed rights in and title to the premises.
(2) If a party not in possession of the premises is found to have had a right to possession at the time the action was commenced, but that right expired before the trial, that party must prove the damages sustained because the premises were wrongfully withheld, and the court shall enter judgment in the amount proved.
(E) Claim for Reasonable Value of Use of Premises.
(1) Within 28 days after the finding of title, the party found to have title to the premises may file a claim against the party who withheld possession of the premises for the reasonable value of the use of the premises during the period the premises were withheld, beginning 6 years before the action was commenced.
(2) The court shall hear evidence and make findings, determining the value of the use of the premises.
(a) The findings must be based on the value of the use of the premises in their condition at the time the withholding party, or those through whom that party claims, first went into possession. The use of the buildings or improvements put on the land by the party who withheld possession may not be considered.
(b) The findings must be based on the general value of the use of the premises, not on a peculiar value the use of the premises had to the party who withheld possession or might have had to the party who had title.
(F) Claim for Value of Buildings Erected and Improvements Made on Premises.
(1) Within 28 days after the finding of title, a party may file a claim against the party found to have title to the premises for the amount that the present value of the premises has been increased by the erection of buildings or the making of improvements by the party making the claim or those through whom he or she claims.
(2) The court shall hear evidence as to the value of the buildings erected and the improvements made on the premises, and the value the premises would have if they had not been improved or built upon. The court shall determine the amount the premises would be worth at the time of the claim had the premises not been improved, and the amount the value of the premises was increased at the time of the claim by the buildings erected and improvements made.
(3) The party claiming the value of the improvements may not recover their value if they were made in bad faith.
(G) Election by Party in Title.
(1) The person found to have title to the premises may elect to abandon them to the party claiming the value of the improvements and to take a judgment against that party for the value the premises would have had at the time of the trial if they had not been improved. The election must be filed with the court within 28 days after the findings on the claim for improvements. The judgment for the value of the premises is a lien against the premises.
(2) If the person found to have title does not elect to abandon the premises under subrule (G) (1), the judgment will provide that he or she recover the premises and pay the value of the improvements to the clerk of the court within the time set in the judgment.
(a) The person found to have title must pay the amount, plus accrued interest, before taking possession of the premises under the judgment, if that person is not already in possession.
(b) If the person found to have title fails to pay the amount of the judgment and the accrued interest within the time set in the judgment, he or she is deemed to have abandoned all claim of title to the premises to the parties in whose favor the judgment for the value of the improvements runs.
(H) Judgment Binding Only on Parties to Action. Except for title acquired by adverse possession, the judgment determining a claim to title, equitable title, right to possession, or other interests in lands under this rule, determines only the rights and interests of the known and unknown persons who are parties to the action, and of persons claiming through those parties by title accruing after the commencement of the action.
(I) Possession Under Judgment Not to be Affected by Vacation of Judgment Alone. When the judgment in an action under these rules determines that a party is entitled to possession of the premises in dispute, that party's right to possession is not affected by vacation of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, until a contrary judgment is rendered as a result of the new trial.
End

Plain-English Summary

MCR 3.411 is Michigan's quiet title procedure. It applies to actions to determine interests in land under MCL 600.2932 and does not apply to summary proceedings to recover possession of premises under MCL 600.5701-600.5759. The rule covers how the case is pleaded, how each side discloses its paper title, and what happens after the court decides who holds title.

Pleading the land and the claims

Subrule (B)(1) requires the complaint to describe the land with reasonable certainty by section, township, and range; by block and lot number; or by another description clear enough that the premises may be identified. Subrule (B)(2) requires the complaint to allege the interest the plaintiff claims, the interest the defendant claims, and the facts establishing the superiority of the plaintiff's claim.

Written evidence of title

Subrule (C) puts teeth in disclosure. Written evidence of title may not be introduced at trial unless it has been sufficiently referred to in the pleadings. The plaintiff attaches to the complaint, and the defendant to the answer, a statement of the title relied on, showing from whom the title was obtained and the page and book where it appears of record. After a demand, a party has a reasonable time to furnish a copy of an unrecorded conveyance relied on or to give a satisfactory reason for not doing so.

Findings on title

Under subrule (D)(1) the court makes findings determining the disputed rights in and title to the premises after evidence has been taken. Subrule (D)(2) reaches a party out of possession whose right to possession existed when the action was commenced but expired before trial: that party proves the damages sustained because the premises were wrongfully withheld, and the court enters judgment in the amount proved.

Two claims, both within 28 days

Subrules (E) and (F) open a second phase, each triggered within 28 days after the finding of title.

  • Subrule (E) lets the party found to have title claim the reasonable value of the use of the premises against the party who withheld possession, for the period they were withheld, beginning 6 years before the action was commenced. The value is measured generally, in the condition the premises were in when the withholding party first went into possession, without counting buildings or improvements that party added.
  • Subrule (F) lets a party claim the amount by which the present value of the premises has been increased by buildings erected or improvements made by that party or those through whom the party claims. Improvements made in bad faith are not recoverable.

The election

Subrule (G) gives the person found to have title a choice, filed within 28 days after the findings on the improvements claim. That person may abandon the premises to the improver and take a judgment, a lien against the premises, for what they would have been worth at trial unimproved. Otherwise the judgment awards the premises and requires payment of the improvement value to the clerk within the time set. A title holder not already in possession must pay that amount plus accrued interest before taking possession under the judgment, and failure to pay within the time set is deemed abandonment of all claim of title to the parties in whose favor the improvement judgment runs.

Reach of the judgment

Except for title acquired by adverse possession, subrule (H) limits the judgment to the rights of the known and unknown persons who are parties and those claiming through them by title accruing after the action was commenced. Subrule (I) protects possession: vacating the judgment and granting a new trial does not affect a party's right to possession until a contrary judgment is rendered.

Frequently Asked Questions

What has to be in a Michigan quiet title complaint?

Subrule (B)(1) requires the complaint to describe the land in question with reasonable certainty, by the section, township, and range; by the block and lot number; or by another description clear enough that the premises may be identified.

Subrule (B)(2) requires the complaint to allege the interest the plaintiff claims in the premises, the interest the defendant claims, and the facts establishing the superiority of the plaintiff's claim.

Can title documents be used at trial if they were not mentioned in the pleadings?

No. Subrule (C)(1) provides that written evidence of title may not be introduced at trial unless it has been sufficiently referred to in the pleadings in accordance with this rule.

Subrule (C)(2) requires the plaintiff to attach to the complaint, and the defendant to attach to the answer, a statement of the title relied on, showing from whom the title was obtained and the page and book where it appears of record. Under subrule (C)(4) those references may be amended or made more specific under the general rules on amendments and motions for a more definite statement.

How long does a party have to claim the value of use or improvements after a title ruling?

28 days. Subrule (E)(1) gives the party found to have title 28 days after the finding of title to file a claim for the reasonable value of the use of the premises, and subrule (F)(1) gives a party 28 days after the finding of title to file a claim for the increase in value from buildings erected or improvements made.

Subrule (G)(1) uses the same period for the election, measured from the findings on the improvements claim.

How far back can a claim for the value of use of the premises reach?

Subrule (E)(1) allows the claim for the period the premises were withheld, beginning 6 years before the action was commenced.

Subrule (E)(2)(a) fixes the measure: the value of the use of the premises in their condition when the withholding party, or those through whom that party claims, first went into possession, without counting the use of buildings or improvements that party put on the land. Subrule (E)(2)(b) requires general value rather than a peculiar value the use had to either side.

Can someone who built on land they did not own recover for the improvements?

Subrule (F)(1) allows a party to claim the amount by which the present value of the premises has been increased by the erection of buildings or the making of improvements by that party or those through whom the party claims. The court hears evidence on the value of the improvements and on what the premises would be worth unimproved.

Subrule (F)(3) supplies the bar: the party claiming the value of the improvements may not recover if the improvements were made in bad faith.

Does a quiet title judgment bind people who were not parties?

Generally no. Subrule (H) provides that, except for title acquired by adverse possession, the judgment determines only the rights and interests of the known and unknown persons who are parties to the action, and of persons claiming through those parties by title accruing after the action was commenced.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 3 (Special Proceedings and Actions), as published by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office, current through September 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Mich. Const. 1963, art. VI, § 5). Last verified September 5, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: quiet titledetermine interests in landaction to quiet titlevalue of improvementsbetterment claimwrongfully withheld possessionwritten evidence of title