RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.304.Habeas Corpus to Bring Prisoner to Testify or for Prosecution

Subchapter 3.300 — Extraordinary Writs · Last verified September 5, 2026

In one sentenceMCR 3.304 allows a court of record to issue a writ of habeas corpus bringing a prisoner held in a Michigan jail or prison to court to testify or to face prosecution.

Full Text of Rule 3.304

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

(A) Jurisdiction; When Available. A court of record may issue a writ of habeas corpus directing that a prisoner in a jail or prison in Michigan be brought to testify
(1) on the court's own initiative; or
(2) on the ex parte motion of a party in an action before a court or an officer or body authorized to examine witnesses.
A writ of habeas corpus may also be issued to bring a prisoner to court for prosecution. Subrules (C)-(G) apply to such a writ.
(B) Contents of Motion. The motion must be verified by the party and must state
(1) the title and nature of the action in which the testimony of the prisoner is desired; and
(2) that the testimony of the prisoner is relevant and necessary to the party in that proceeding.
(C) Direction to Surrender Custody for Transportation. The writ may direct that the prisoner be placed in the custody of a designated officer for transportation to the place where the hearing or trial is to be held, rather than requiring the custodian to bring the prisoner to that place.
(D) Form of Writ. A writ of habeas corpus to produce a prisoner to testify or for prosecution must be substantially in the form approved by the state court administrator.
(E) Answer and Hearing. If the prisoner is produced or delivered to the custody of a designated officer as ordered, the person served with the writ need not answer the writ, and a hearing on the writ is unnecessary.
(F) Remand. When a prisoner is brought on a writ of habeas corpus to testify or for prosecution, the prisoner must be returned to the original custodian after testifying or prosecution.
(G) Applicability of Other Rules. MCR 3.303(G), (I), (J), and (K)(1) apply to habeas corpus to produce a prisoner to testify or for prosecution.
End

Plain-English Summary

This habeas rule has nothing to do with testing the legality of a detention. Under MCR 3.304 the writ works as a production order: it brings a prisoner held in a jail or prison in Michigan into court, either to give testimony or to answer a prosecution.

Who can ask, and how

Subrule (A) gives two routes to a testimonial writ. The court may issue it on its own initiative under subrule (A)(1), or a party may move ex parte under subrule (A)(2). The motion route is open in an action before a court and also before an officer or body authorized to examine witnesses, so the rule reaches past trial courtrooms. The closing sentence of subrule (A) recognizes the second use of the writ, bringing a prisoner to court for prosecution, and applies subrules (C) through (G) to it.

What the motion must say

Subrule (B) keeps the showing short but demands verification by the party. The motion must state the title and nature of the action in which the prisoner's testimony is desired, and that the testimony is relevant and necessary to the party in that proceeding. Both adjectives are in the rule: relevance alone is not the standard the subrule sets.

Custody and transport

Subrule (C) offers the court an alternative to ordering the custodian to make the trip. The writ may direct that the prisoner be placed in the custody of a designated officer for transportation to the place where the hearing or trial is to be held. Subrule (F) closes the loop: a prisoner brought on this writ must be returned to the original custodian after testifying or after the prosecution.

Form and follow-through

Subrule (D) requires the writ to be substantially in the form approved by the state court administrator. Subrule (E) then removes a step the detention rule would otherwise require. If the prisoner is produced or delivered to the designated officer as ordered, the person served need not answer the writ, and no hearing on the writ is necessary. Compliance is the answer.

Subrule (G) borrows from the detention rule rather than repeating it: MCR 3.303(G), (I), (J), and (K)(1) apply here. That supplies the endorsement of allowance, the service provisions and tender of fees, the tolerance for defects in form, and the timing rule for a writ that names a specific day and hour for the answer and the production of the prisoner.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a party get a prisoner brought to a Michigan court to testify?

By ex parte motion under subrule (A)(2), asking a court of record to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing that a prisoner in a jail or prison in Michigan be brought to testify. Subrule (A)(1) also lets the court issue the writ on its own initiative.

What must a motion for a writ to produce a prisoner contain?

Subrule (B) requires the motion to be verified by the party and to state the title and nature of the action in which the prisoner's testimony is desired, and that the testimony is relevant and necessary to that party in the proceeding.

Does the custodian have to answer the writ?

Not if the writ is obeyed. Subrule (E) provides that if the prisoner is produced or delivered to the custody of a designated officer as ordered, the person served need not answer the writ and a hearing on the writ is unnecessary.

Can someone other than the jail bring the prisoner to court?

Yes. Subrule (C) allows the writ to direct that the prisoner be placed in the custody of a designated officer for transportation to the place of the hearing or trial, instead of requiring the custodian to make the trip.

What happens to the prisoner after testifying?

Subrule (F) requires the prisoner to be returned to the original custodian after testifying or after the prosecution.

Can this writ be used to bring a prisoner in for prosecution?

Yes. The last sentence of subrule (A) recognizes a writ of habeas corpus to bring a prisoner to court for prosecution and applies subrules (C) through (G) to that writ.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 3 (Special Proceedings and Actions), as published by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office, current through September 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Mich. Const. 1963, art. VI, § 5). Last verified September 5, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: habeas corpus ad testificandumhabeas corpus ad prosequendumwrit to produce prisonerprisoner testimonybring prisoner to courtwrit of habeas corpus to testify