Rule 3.102.Garnishment Before Judgment
Subchapter 3.100 — Debtor-Creditor · Last verified September 5, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.102
Plain-English Summary
MCR 3.102 covers the garnishment that runs before any judgment exists. It works as a holding device. The plaintiff has filed suit on a contract, cannot get the defendant served, and asks the court to freeze money or property in a third party's hands so that a later judgment has something to reach.
When it is available
Subrule (A) draws the boundaries. The action must already be commenced and must rest on a contract. The defendant must be subject to the court's jurisdiction under chapter 7 of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.701 and the sections that follow. Two other uses are closed off: the defendant's earnings may not be garnished before judgment, and neither may property held or an obligation owed by the state or a governmental unit of the state.
The foreign judgment variation
Subrule (A)(3) opens the rule to an action brought to enforce a foreign judgment, with adjustments. The defendant need not be subject to the court's jurisdiction. The request must show that the defendant owes a stated amount on the foreign judgment in excess of all setoffs, that the defendant is not subject to the state's jurisdiction or cannot be served after diligent effort, and that a named person controls the defendant's property or owes the defendant a debt. Subrule (H), which routes objections and dissolution to other rules, does not apply to that variation.
Getting the writ
Under subrule (B) the plaintiff files an ex parte motion supported by a verified statement of specific facts: a contract debt in a stated amount in excess of all setoffs, the defendant's amenability to the state's jurisdiction, an inability to serve process after diligent effort, and good reason to believe that a named person controls property of or is indebted to the defendant. The judge to whom the action is assigned decides whether the writ issues, on findings that the writ is available under the rule and that the statement gives a sufficient basis for it.
Borrowed machinery
Most of what follows comes from MCR 3.101. Service tracks subrule (F) of that rule. Garnishee liability tracks subrule (G), except that earnings stay out of reach. Disclosure tracks subrule (H). Withholding and payment track subrules (I) and (J), with one change that defines the whole procedure: nothing may be paid to the plaintiff until judgment enters. Objections and dissolution run through MCR 3.101(K) and MCR 3.103(H), and costs, default, contempt, and requests to extend deadlines through MCR 3.101(R), (S), and (T). The writ itself, described in subrule (C), carries the verified statement, tells the garnishee to disclose within 14 days and to hold property and payments in place, requires the garnishee to get a copy to the defendant, and warns the defendant that unless objections are filed within 14 days after service, or the defendant appears and submits to the court's jurisdiction, an order may direct the garnished property toward the plaintiff's claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can wages be garnished before a judgment in Michigan?
No. Subrule (A)(2)(b) bars using prejudgment garnishment to reach a defendant's earnings, and subrule (E) repeats the point when it borrows the liability provisions of MCR 3.101(G): the earnings of the defendant may not be garnished before judgment.
What must the verified statement supporting a prejudgment writ show?
Subrule (B) asks for specific facts on four points: that the defendant owes the plaintiff a stated amount on a contract in excess of all setoffs, that the defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of the state, that the plaintiff cannot serve the defendant with process after diligent effort, and that the signer knows or has good reason to believe a named person controls property belonging to the defendant or is indebted to the defendant.
Can a plaintiff garnish the state before judgment?
No. Subrule (A)(2)(c) removes property held or an obligation owed by the state or a governmental unit of the state from the reach of a prejudgment writ.
How does prejudgment garnishment work in an action on a foreign judgment?
Subrule (A)(3) keeps the rule available but changes the showing. The defendant need not be subject to the court's jurisdiction, and the request must establish the amount owed on the foreign judgment in excess of setoffs, that the defendant is beyond the state's jurisdiction or cannot be served after diligent effort, and that a named person controls the defendant's property or owes the defendant money. Subrule (H) does not apply in that setting.
When can the plaintiff be paid the garnished funds?
Not before judgment. Subrule (G) borrows the withholding and payment provisions of MCR 3.101 with the express exception that payment may not be made to the plaintiff until after entry of judgment. Subrule (I) then allows the garnished property or obligation to be applied to the judgment if the garnishment was still in effect when judgment entered for the plaintiff.
Who decides whether a prejudgment writ issues?
The judge assigned to the action, acting on the plaintiff's ex parte motion under subrule (B). The judge must find both that the writ is available under this rule and that the verified statement states a sufficient basis for issuing it.