RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.102.Garnishment Before Judgment

Subchapter 3.100 — Debtor-Creditor · Last verified September 5, 2026

In one sentenceMCR 3.102 lets a plaintiff who has sued on a contract but cannot serve the defendant obtain an ex parte writ of garnishment before judgment, subject to limits on earnings, government garnishees, and jurisdiction.

Full Text of Rule 3.102

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

(A) Availability of Prejudgment Garnishment.
(1) After commencing an action on a contract, the plaintiff may obtain a prejudgment writ of garnishment under the circumstances and by the procedures provided in this rule.
(2) Except as provided in subrule (A)(3), a prejudgment garnishment may not be used
(a) unless the defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of the court under chapter 7 of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.701 et seq.;
(b) to garnish a defendant's earnings; or
(c) to garnish property held or an obligation owed by the state or a governmental unit of the state.
(3) This rule also applies to a prejudgment garnishment in an action brought to enforce a foreign judgment. However, the following provisions apply:
(a) The defendant need not be subject to the court's jurisdiction;
(b) The request for garnishment must show that
(i) the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff on a foreign judgment in a stated amount in excess of all setoffs;
(ii) the defendant is not subject to the jurisdiction of the state, or that after diligent effort the plaintiff cannot serve the defendant with process; and
(iii) the person making the request knows or has good reason to believe that a named person
(A) has control of property belonging to the defendant, or
(B) is indebted to the defendant.
(c) Subrule (H) does not apply.
(B) Request for Garnishment. After commencing an action, the plaintiff may seek a writ of garnishment by filing an ex parte motion supported by a verified statement setting forth specific facts showing that:
(1) the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff on a contract in a stated amount in excess of all setoffs;
(2) the defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of the state;
(3) after diligent effort the plaintiff cannot serve the defendant with process; and
(4) the person signing the statement knows or has good reason to believe that a named person
(a) has control of property belonging to the defendant, or
(b) is indebted to the defendant.
On a finding that the writ is available under this rule and that the verified statement states a sufficient basis for issuance of the writ, the judge to whom the action is assigned may issue the writ.
(C) Writ of Garnishment. The writ of garnishment must have attached or include a copy of the verified statement, and must:
(1) direct the garnishee to:
(a) file with the court clerk within 14 days after the service of the writ on him or her a verified disclosure indicating his or her liability (as specified in subrule [E]) to the defendant;
(b) deliver no tangible or intangible property to the defendant, unless allowed by statute or court rule;
(c) pay no obligation to the defendant, unless allowed by statute or court rule; and
(d) promptly provide the defendant with a copy of the writ and verified statement by personal delivery or by first class mail directed to the defendant's last known address;
(2) direct the defendant to refrain from disposing of any negotiable instrument representing a debt of the garnishee or of any negotiable instrument of title representing property in which he or she claims an interest held in the possession or control of the garnishee;
(3) inform the defendant that unless the defendant files objections within 14 days after service of the writ on the defendant, or appears and submits to the jurisdiction of the court, an order may enter requiring the garnishee to deliver the garnished property or pay the obligation to be applied to the satisfaction of the plaintiff's claim; and
(4) command the process server to serve the writ and to file a proof of service.
(D) Service of Writ. MCR 3.101(F) applies to prejudgment garnishment.
(E) Liability of Garnishee. MCR 3.101(G) applies to prejudgment garnishment except that the earnings of the defendant may not be garnished before judgment.
(F) Disclosure. The garnishee shall file and serve a disclosure as provided in MCR 3.101(H).
(G) Payment or Deposit Into Court. MCR 3.101(I) and (J) apply to prejudgment garnishment, except that payment may not be made to the plaintiff until after entry of judgment, as provided in subrule (I).
(H) Objection; Dissolution of Prejudgment Garnishment. Objections to and dissolution of a prejudgment garnishment are governed by MCR 3.101(K) and MCR 3.103(H).
(I) Proceedings After Judgment.
(1) If the garnishment remains in effect until entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant, the garnished property or obligation may be applied to the satisfaction of the judgment in the manner provided in MCR 3.101(I), (J), (M), and (O).
(2) MCR 3.101(P) and (Q) and MCR 3.103(I)(2) apply to prejudgment garnishment.
(J) Costs and Fees; Default; Contempt; Judicial Discretion. MCR 3.101(R), (S), and (T) apply to prejudgment garnishment.
End

Plain-English Summary

MCR 3.102 covers the garnishment that runs before any judgment exists. It works as a holding device. The plaintiff has filed suit on a contract, cannot get the defendant served, and asks the court to freeze money or property in a third party's hands so that a later judgment has something to reach.

When it is available

Subrule (A) draws the boundaries. The action must already be commenced and must rest on a contract. The defendant must be subject to the court's jurisdiction under chapter 7 of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.701 and the sections that follow. Two other uses are closed off: the defendant's earnings may not be garnished before judgment, and neither may property held or an obligation owed by the state or a governmental unit of the state.

The foreign judgment variation

Subrule (A)(3) opens the rule to an action brought to enforce a foreign judgment, with adjustments. The defendant need not be subject to the court's jurisdiction. The request must show that the defendant owes a stated amount on the foreign judgment in excess of all setoffs, that the defendant is not subject to the state's jurisdiction or cannot be served after diligent effort, and that a named person controls the defendant's property or owes the defendant a debt. Subrule (H), which routes objections and dissolution to other rules, does not apply to that variation.

Getting the writ

Under subrule (B) the plaintiff files an ex parte motion supported by a verified statement of specific facts: a contract debt in a stated amount in excess of all setoffs, the defendant's amenability to the state's jurisdiction, an inability to serve process after diligent effort, and good reason to believe that a named person controls property of or is indebted to the defendant. The judge to whom the action is assigned decides whether the writ issues, on findings that the writ is available under the rule and that the statement gives a sufficient basis for it.

Borrowed machinery

Most of what follows comes from MCR 3.101. Service tracks subrule (F) of that rule. Garnishee liability tracks subrule (G), except that earnings stay out of reach. Disclosure tracks subrule (H). Withholding and payment track subrules (I) and (J), with one change that defines the whole procedure: nothing may be paid to the plaintiff until judgment enters. Objections and dissolution run through MCR 3.101(K) and MCR 3.103(H), and costs, default, contempt, and requests to extend deadlines through MCR 3.101(R), (S), and (T). The writ itself, described in subrule (C), carries the verified statement, tells the garnishee to disclose within 14 days and to hold property and payments in place, requires the garnishee to get a copy to the defendant, and warns the defendant that unless objections are filed within 14 days after service, or the defendant appears and submits to the court's jurisdiction, an order may direct the garnished property toward the plaintiff's claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can wages be garnished before a judgment in Michigan?

No. Subrule (A)(2)(b) bars using prejudgment garnishment to reach a defendant's earnings, and subrule (E) repeats the point when it borrows the liability provisions of MCR 3.101(G): the earnings of the defendant may not be garnished before judgment.

What must the verified statement supporting a prejudgment writ show?

Subrule (B) asks for specific facts on four points: that the defendant owes the plaintiff a stated amount on a contract in excess of all setoffs, that the defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of the state, that the plaintiff cannot serve the defendant with process after diligent effort, and that the signer knows or has good reason to believe a named person controls property belonging to the defendant or is indebted to the defendant.

Can a plaintiff garnish the state before judgment?

No. Subrule (A)(2)(c) removes property held or an obligation owed by the state or a governmental unit of the state from the reach of a prejudgment writ.

How does prejudgment garnishment work in an action on a foreign judgment?

Subrule (A)(3) keeps the rule available but changes the showing. The defendant need not be subject to the court's jurisdiction, and the request must establish the amount owed on the foreign judgment in excess of setoffs, that the defendant is beyond the state's jurisdiction or cannot be served after diligent effort, and that a named person controls the defendant's property or owes the defendant money. Subrule (H) does not apply in that setting.

When can the plaintiff be paid the garnished funds?

Not before judgment. Subrule (G) borrows the withholding and payment provisions of MCR 3.101 with the express exception that payment may not be made to the plaintiff until after entry of judgment. Subrule (I) then allows the garnished property or obligation to be applied to the judgment if the garnishment was still in effect when judgment entered for the plaintiff.

Who decides whether a prejudgment writ issues?

The judge assigned to the action, acting on the plaintiff's ex parte motion under subrule (B). The judge must find both that the writ is available under this rule and that the verified statement states a sufficient basis for issuing it.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 3 (Special Proceedings and Actions), as published by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office, current through September 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Michigan (Mich. Const. 1963, art. VI, § 5). Last verified September 5, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: prejudgment garnishmentgarnishment before judgmentex parte writ of garnishmentprejudgment writforeign judgment garnishmentfreezing assets before judgment