Rule 3.002.Indian Children
Subchapter 3.000 — General Provisions · Last verified September 5, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.002
Plain-English Summary
MCR 3.002 is a definitions rule and nothing else. It gathers the vocabulary a court needs when it applies the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 USC 1901 et seq., and the Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act, MCL 712B.1 et seq., to proceedings under the Juvenile Code, the Adoption Code, and the Estates and Protected Individuals Code. The definitions are taken from MCL 712B.3 and MCL 712B.7, which keeps the court rules and the statute speaking one language. Twenty-four numbered definitions follow.
Who the rule covers
Subrule (12) defines an Indian child as an unmarried person under age 18 who is either a member of an Indian tribe or eligible for membership as that tribe determines. Eligibility is the tribe's call. Subrule (13) then identifies the child's tribe and, where the child is a member of or eligible in more than one, points to the tribe with which the child has the most significant contacts. Subrule (20) defines a parent as any biological parent of an Indian child, or any Indian person who has lawfully adopted the child, including adoptions under tribal law or custom, and excludes a putative father whose paternity has not been acknowledged or established. Subrule (7) defines extended family member first by the law or custom of the child's tribe, and only in the absence of such law or custom by a listed set of relatives, each of whom has reached the age of 18 years.
Which proceedings
Subrule (2) sets out four kinds of child custody proceeding, each with its own short definition: foster-care placement, termination of parental rights, preadoptive placement, and adoptive placement. The subrule then marks the outer edge. The term does not reach a placement based on an act that would be deemed a crime if an adult committed it, and it does not reach an award of custody to one of the parents in a divorce proceeding.
Active efforts
Subrule (1) carries the longest definition in the rule. Active efforts are actions providing remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and to reunify the child with that family. The rule states that a referral to a service is not enough on its own, without actively engaging the child and family. The definition takes in the reasonable efforts required by title IV-E of the social security act, 42 USC 670 to 679c, and then adds twelve items, (a) through (l), all of which must be done or addressed. They range from culturally appropriate engagement of the child, parents, tribe, and extended family, through a diligent search for extended family members for placement, to monitoring client progress and participation in services.
Tribal definitions and tribal roles
Subrule (4) describes culturally appropriate services and closes with a deference clause: if the Indian child's tribe establishes a different definition, the court follows the tribe's. Subrule (19) recognizes an official tribal representative designated by the tribe, who does not need to be an attorney, as is also true of the guardian ad litem in subrule (10). Subrule (6) states what exclusive jurisdiction means for a child who resides or is domiciled within the tribe's reservation, subject to an exception where existing federal law vests that jurisdiction in the state, and it keeps that exclusive jurisdiction with the tribe for a ward of tribal court regardless of a later change in residence or domicile. Subrule (3) fixes the word court as the family division of circuit court or the probate court.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who counts as an Indian child under the Michigan Court Rules?
Subrule (12) defines an Indian child as an unmarried person under age 18 who is a member of an Indian tribe, or who is eligible for membership in a tribe as that tribe determines. The membership question belongs to the tribe.
Subrule (13) then names the Indian child's tribe. Where the child is a member of or eligible for membership in more than one tribe, the rule points to the tribe with which the child has the most significant contacts.
What are active efforts in a Michigan Indian child case?
Subrule (1) defines active efforts as actions to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and to reunify the child with the Indian family. The rule adds that a referral to a service, standing alone, does not satisfy the standard without actively engaging the child and family.
The definition includes the reasonable efforts required by title IV-E of the social security act, 42 USC 670 to 679c, and lists twelve further items, (a) through (l), all of which must be done or addressed. Among them are a diligent search for extended family members for placement, identifying, notifying, and inviting tribal representatives to participate in all aspects of the proceeding at the earliest possible point, offering and employing all available family preservation strategies, and monitoring client progress and participation in services.
Which cases are child custody proceedings under MCR 3.002?
Subrule (2) names four: foster-care placement, which is a removal for temporary placement where the child cannot be returned on demand but parental rights remain intact; termination of parental rights; preadoptive placement, which is temporary placement after termination but before or in lieu of adoptive placement; and adoptive placement, the permanent placement for adoption, including any action resulting in a final decree of adoption.
Does a custody award in a divorce fall under these definitions?
No. Subrule (2) closes by taking an award of custody to one of the parents in a divorce proceeding outside the term child custody proceeding. The same sentence excludes a placement based on an act that, if committed by an adult, would be deemed a crime.
Who is an extended family member for placement purposes?
Subrule (7) looks first to the law or custom of the Indian child's tribe. Only where the tribe has no such law or custom does the rule supply its own list: a person who has reached the age of 18 years and who is the child's grandparent, aunt or uncle, brother or sister, brother-in-law or sister-in-law, niece or nephew, first or second cousin, or stepparent.
The definition also takes in the term relative as it is defined in MCL 712A.13a(1)(j).
Can a tribe's own definition of culturally appropriate services control in court?
Yes. Subrule (4) describes culturally appropriate services as services that enhance an Indian child's and family's relationship to, identification, and connection with the child's tribe, and it names the people who may be involved, including tribal representatives, extended family members, tribal elders, spiritual and cultural advisors, tribal social services, individual Indian caregivers, medicine men or women, and natural healers.
The subrule ends with a deference clause. If the Indian child's tribe establishes a different definition of culturally appropriate services, the court follows the tribe's definition.