Art. 4567.Expenses of Interdict and Legal Dependents
Book VII. Special Proceedings · Title VIII. Interdiction and Curatorship of Interdicts · Chapter 2. Curators and Undercurators · Enacted 2000 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 4567
Amendment History
Acts 2000, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 25, §3, eff. 7/1/2001.
Plain-English Summary
The interdict's care has to be paid for, and Article 4567 sets the order of priority for where that money comes from. The curator spends whatever portion of the revenue the interdict's property generates as necessary to properly care for the interdict's person or affairs -- ordinary income funding ordinary care without requiring a fresh court order for every expenditure, much as Article 4261 lets a tutor use a minor's income for the minor's care.
The interdict's obligations to others do not disappear because the interdict has been interdicted. With court authorization, the curator can also use that revenue to support the interdict's legal dependents -- a spouse or children who relied on the interdict for support, for instance -- keeping those obligations met even though the interdict can no longer manage them personally.
Only when the revenue is not enough for these purposes can the curator reach into the interdict's capital, and even then only with court authorization obtained through the procedure Article 4271 sets out. That sequencing protects the underlying estate, spending it down only after the income it produces has already been exhausted.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who pays for an interdict's day-to-day care in Louisiana?
The curator, using the revenue generated by the interdict's own property.
Can a curator use the interdict's money to support the interdict's spouse or children?
Yes, but only with court authorization.
Can a curator dip into the interdict's savings or principal, not just income?
Only with court authorization under the Article 4271 procedure, and only after the revenue from the interdict's property proves insufficient.