Art. 2753.Security Not Required In Certain Cases
Book V. Summary and Executory Proceedings · Title II. Executory Proceedings · Chapter 5. Injunction to Arrest Seizure and Sale · Last amended 1989 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 2753
Amendment History
Acts 1983, No. 341, §1; Acts 1987, No. 304, §1; Acts 1989, No. 137, §18, eff. 9/1/1989.
Plain-English Summary
Seeking a restraining order or preliminary injunction normally means putting up security -- money or a bond that protects the other side if the injunction turns out to have been wrongfully issued. Article 2753 excuses the original debtor and those standing in the debtor's shoes -- a surviving spouse in community, heirs, legatees, or a legal representative -- from that requirement, but only when the injunction rests solely on one or more of five specific grounds.
Those grounds share a common thread: each one, if true, would mean the creditor should never have been able to seize the property in the first place, so the law does not make the defendant pay to prove it. They are that the secured debt is extinguished or has prescribed; that enforcement is premature because the payment term, or an extension the creditor granted, had not yet run out when the executory proceeding began; that the mortgage or security document is forged, or that the debtor's signature on it was procured by fraud, violence, or other unlawful means; that the defendant holds a liquidated claim against the creditor that can offset the debt; or that the order authorizing the writ issued without the authentic evidence the law requires, or on evidence that was not truly authentic in the first place.
Two further limits round out the article. A redhibition claim -- the civil-law warranty remedy for a hidden defect in a thing sold -- cannot support a security-free injunction under this article; a defendant relying on redhibition still has to post security like any other injunction applicant. And a claim that the attorney's fees set in the mortgage or security document are unreasonable cannot support a restraining order or preliminary injunction at all, with or without security. That kind of dispute has to be raised another way: through a rule to show cause filed at least ten days before the sale and tried summarily before the sale happens, or later, folded into a proceeding seeking a deficiency judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does a debtor not have to post a bond to stop a Louisiana executory sale?
When the injunction rests solely on one of five listed grounds: an extinguished or prescribed debt, prematurity, forgery or fraud in the mortgage act, a liquidated offset claim, or insufficient authentic evidence behind the order for the writ.
Can a redhibition claim stop a seizure and sale without posting security?
No. Article 2753 specifically excludes redhibition claims from the security-free grounds, so security is still required.
Can a debtor challenge the attorney's fees in the mortgage to stop the sale?
No. Article 2753 bars that claim as a ground for any restraining order or preliminary injunction; it must instead be raised through a rule to show cause before the sale or in a later deficiency judgment proceeding.
What is a liquidated claim to plead in compensation?
A fixed, determinable claim the defendant holds against the creditor that can be offset against the secured debt, one of the grounds that excuses posting security under this article.