Art. 1845.Effects of Judgments On State Law
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title VI. Judgments · Chapter 1. General Dispositions · Enacted 2024 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1845
Amendment History
Added by Acts 2024EX2, No. 12, §1, eff. 4/29/2024.
Plain-English Summary
Striking down a law is one of the most consequential things a Louisiana court can do, and Article 1845 ties that power to a procedural condition. If a court renders a judgment declaring a state law unconstitutional without first satisfying the pleading and notice requirements of Article 855.1, the judgment is not merely vulnerable to reversal on appeal -- it is absolutely null, void, and unenforceable from the start.
The point of that rule is to make sure the state gets a real chance to defend its own laws before a court sets one aside. Article 855.1's requirements exist to put the challenge to a statute's validity on the record clearly and to give the proper state officials notice and an opportunity to respond. Article 1845 supplies the consequence for skipping that step: no matter how sound the constitutional reasoning behind the judgment, the judgment itself has no legal effect if the underlying procedure was not followed.
This article works in tandem with others in Title VI. Article 1880's parties provision, for instance, requires that the attorney general be served and heard when a party alleges a law is unconstitutional and cross-references both Article 855.1 and Article 1845 directly, reinforcing that a constitutional challenge taken out of proper form risks producing a judgment worth nothing at all.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does it mean for a judgment to be "absolutely null" under Article 1845?
It means the judgment declaring a law unconstitutional has no legal force or effect at all, as though it had never been rendered, rather than only being subject to reversal on appeal.
What is Article 855.1 and why does Article 1845 depend on it?
Article 855.1 sets pleading and notice requirements for challenging a law's constitutionality, and Article 1845 makes compliance with those requirements a condition for a judgment striking down the law to have any legal effect.
Does Article 1845 apply only to state statutes, or to other kinds of laws as well?
Article 1845 speaks in terms of a judgment rendering a law unconstitutional; related provisions in the Code, such as Article 1880, extend comparable notice requirements to challenges involving municipal ordinances and franchises.
Can a party cure a defective constitutional challenge after a judgment has already been rendered?
Article 1845 does not describe a cure; it declares the judgment absolutely null if the required procedure was not followed, which points toward starting the challenge over in proper form.