Art. 1066.Action Matured Or Acquired After Pleading
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title I. Pleading · Chapter 6. Incidental Actions · Amendment history unavailable · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1066
Plain-English Summary
The general timing rule in Article 1033 ties incidental demands to the filing of the answer. Article 1066 addresses what happens when a defendant's claim didn't even exist yet at that point — a debt that matures later, or a claim the defendant acquires from someone else after already answering the principal demand.
Rather than forcing the defendant into a wholly separate lawsuit for a claim that came into being too late to include in the original answer, Article 1066 lets the defendant add it to the case by supplemental pleading, with the court's permission. The claim becomes a reconventional demand even though it didn't exist, or wasn't yet the defendant's, when the answer was first filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a defendant add a reconventional demand for a claim that didn't exist when the answer was filed?
Yes, with the court's permission. Article 1066 allows a claim that matured or was acquired after the answer to be presented as a reconventional demand by supplemental pleading.
Does a defendant need the court's permission to file under Article 1066?
Yes. The article conditions this kind of late reconventional demand on court permission.