Art. 1061.Actions Pleaded In Reconventional Demand; Compulsory
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title I. Pleading · Chapter 6. Incidental Actions · Last amended 2023 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1061
Amendment History
Amended by Acts 2023, No. 421, §2, eff. 8/1/2023. Acts 1990, No. 521, §2, eff. 1/1/1991; Acts 1991, No. 367, §2; Acts 2006, No. 344, §2, eff. 6/13/2006.
Plain-English Summary
A reconventional demand is Louisiana's term for what other states call a counterclaim: the defendant's own claim against the plaintiff, litigated inside the plaintiff's own suit rather than as a separate lawsuit. Article 1061 sets out two distinct rules depending on where the defendant's claim comes from.
Subsection A covers permissive reconventional demands. A defendant can bring any cause of action against the plaintiff — even one with nothing to do with the plaintiff's suit, even if both parties live in the same parish — as a reconventional demand. Louisiana doesn't require the claims to be connected before letting the defendant raise them together.
Subsection B goes further and makes some reconventional demands mandatory. With a few statutory exceptions — including the situation addressed in Article 3657, certain divorce actions under Civil Code Articles 102 and 103, and an action identified in Civil Code Article 186 — a defendant must assert in a reconventional demand every claim against the plaintiff that arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the principal demand. Skip it, and Article 1037 generally bars raising it in a later, separate suit.
The line Louisiana draws is the transaction-or-occurrence test: does the defendant's claim grow out of the same set of events as the plaintiff's claim? If so, it has to come out now, in this suit. If not, the defendant can raise it now, later, or never, entirely as a matter of choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a reconventional demand?
It's Louisiana's term for a counterclaim — a defendant's own claim against the plaintiff, asserted within the plaintiff's pending suit rather than as a separate lawsuit.
Does a defendant's reconventional demand have to be related to the plaintiff's claim?
Not always. Article 1061(A) lets a defendant raise any claim against the plaintiff as a permissive reconventional demand, connected or not. But if the claim arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's suit, Article 1061(B) makes raising it mandatory.
What happens if a defendant doesn't raise a compulsory reconventional demand?
The claim is generally lost. Article 1037 bars bringing it later as a separate action once it qualified as compulsory under Article 1061(B) and wasn't raised.
Are there exceptions to the compulsory reconventional demand rule?
Yes. Article 1061(B) exempts the situation addressed in Article 3657, certain divorce actions under Civil Code Articles 102 and 103, and an action identified in Civil Code Article 186.