RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 11.2.Abusive Litigation

Current through August 1, 2026 · Last verified September 28, 2026

In one sentenceTrial Rule 11.2 lets an Indiana court find that a filer is an abusive litigant, based on conduct such as frivolous or repetitive claims, bad-faith litigation, or fictitious citations, and then restrict that filer’s future filings or, after a chance for a hearing, impose sanctions.

Full Text of Rule 11.2

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

(A) Definitions.
(1) Filer. For purposes of this rule, “filer” means a party or other litigant who files, or on whose behalf is filed, a pleading, motion, or other submission to the court.
(2) Abusive litigant. An abusive litigant under this rule is a filer who engages in conduct that may include, but is not limited to, filing frivolous, unreasonable, groundless, or repetitive claims; litigating claims in bad faith; citing fictitious legal authority; or egregiously violating the Rules of Trial Procedure or Rules on Access to Court Records.
(B) Findings. The court, upon the motion of any party or on its own initiative and after considering a filer’s litigation history, may make a finding that a filer is an abusive litigant.
(C) Remedies. Upon a finding that a filer is an abusive litigant, a court may impose reasonable conditions and restrictions on the filer’s ability to commence or continue actions, as specified by order, that are tailored to the filer’s particular practices. The court may, without limitation, impose one or more of the following conditions or restrictions:
(1) require the filer to accompany future filings with an affidavit certifying under penalty of perjury that the allegations are true to the best of the filer's knowledge, information, and belief;
(2) direct the filer to attach to future complaints a list of all cases previously filed involving the same, similar, or related cause of action;
(3) direct that future pleadings be stricken if they do not meet the requirements that a pleading must contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and that each averment of a pleading must be simple, concise, and direct;
(4) require the filer to state clearly and concisely, at the beginning of a motion, the relief requested;
(5) require the filer to provide specific page citations to documents alleged by the filer to support an argument or position;
(6) require the filer to provide argument and citation to authority, explaining why the new action is not subject to dismissal due to res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case;
(7) limit the filer's ability to request reconsideration or to file repetitive motions;
(8) limit the number of pages or words of pleadings, motions, and other submissions to the court;
(9) limit the length of the title that may be used for a filing;
(10) limit the amount or length of exhibits or attachments that may accompany a filing; or
(11) to the extent permitted by law, deny a filer’s request to waive the filing fee in a civil case if the court determines that the filer is asserting a claim upon which the court cannot grant relief, is seeking relief from a defendant who is immune, or is attempting to relitigate a claim barred by res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case.
(D) Sanctions for Bad Faith or Failed Remedies. After an opportunity for hearing, upon a party’s request or on its own initiative, a court may impose sanctions after a finding of bad faith or a finding that the previous remedies have failed. The court may sanction any filer or attorney whose conduct resulted in the court’s finding. Sanctions may include default, dismissal with prejudice, payment of reasonable expenses, and payment of reasonable attorney’s fees.
(E) Other Remedies. This rule does not limit a court’s authority to respond to individual pleadings under Trial Rule 12(F), or to respond to individual filings under Rule 11(C), Rule 11.1(D), or any other rule.
End

Amendment History

This rule’s current text took effect August 1, 2026. The Indiana Supreme Court adopted this rule by order of July 14, 2026 (Cause No. 26S-MS-8), effective August 1, 2026. For the full history of earlier amendments and adoption orders, see the Indiana Office of Court Services.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 11.2 gives trial courts a structured way to deal with a litigant whose filings abuse the process. It starts with two definitions. A “filer” is any party or other litigant who files, or on whose behalf is filed, a pleading, motion, or other submission. An “abusive litigant” is a filer whose conduct may include, among other things, filing frivolous, unreasonable, groundless, or repetitive claims; litigating in bad faith; citing fictitious legal authority; or egregiously violating the Rules of Trial Procedure or the Rules on Access to Court Records. The list is illustrative, not closed.

Section (B) sets how the finding is made. The court may act on any party’s motion or on its own, and it makes the finding that a filer is an abusive litigant after considering the filer’s litigation history.

Section (C) supplies the tools. After the finding, the court may, by order, impose reasonable conditions and restrictions on the filer’s ability to start or continue actions, tailored to that filer’s particular practices. The rule lists examples without limiting the court: requiring an affidavit under penalty of perjury with future filings; requiring a list of earlier cases on the same or related claims; striking future pleadings that are not short, plain, simple, concise, and direct; requiring the relief requested to be stated at the start of a motion; requiring page citations to supporting documents; requiring an explanation of why a new action is not barred by res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case; limiting motions to reconsider and repetitive motions; limiting pages or words, title length, and exhibits; and, to the extent the law allows, denying a request to waive the filing fee when the filer is asserting a claim on which the court cannot grant relief, is seeking relief from an immune defendant, or is trying to relitigate a barred claim.

Section (D) reaches further. After an opportunity for a hearing, the court may impose sanctions once it finds bad faith or finds that the earlier remedies have failed. Sanctions can fall on any filer or attorney whose conduct led to the finding, and may include default, dismissal with prejudice, and payment of reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees. Section (E) keeps the court’s other tools intact: striking pleadings under Trial Rule 12(F), striking noncompliant filings under Rule 11(C) or Rule 11.1(D), and any other rule.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes someone an “abusive litigant” in Indiana?

Conduct that may include filing frivolous, unreasonable, groundless, or repetitive claims; litigating in bad faith; citing fictitious legal authority; or egregiously violating the Rules of Trial Procedure or the Rules on Access to Court Records. The rule’s list is not exhaustive, and the court makes the finding only after considering the filer’s litigation history.

Who can ask the court to find that a filer is an abusive litigant?

Any party may move for the finding, and the court may also raise it on its own initiative.

What restrictions can a court put on an abusive litigant?

Reasonable conditions tailored to the filer’s practices and spelled out in an order. Examples in the rule include sworn affidavits with future filings, a list of earlier related cases, page citations for supporting documents, limits on page or word counts and exhibits, limits on motions to reconsider and repetitive motions, and an explanation of why a new case is not barred by res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case.

Can a court refuse an abusive litigant’s request to waive the filing fee?

To the extent the law permits, yes, if the court determines that the filer is asserting a claim on which the court cannot grant relief, is seeking relief from a defendant who is immune, or is trying to relitigate a claim barred by res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case.

When can a court dismiss a case or enter a default as a sanction under Rule 11.2?

Only after an opportunity for a hearing, and only after finding either bad faith or that the earlier remedies have failed. Available sanctions include default, dismissal with prejudice, and payment of reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees.

Can a lawyer be sanctioned under Rule 11.2?

Yes. The court may sanction any filer or attorney whose conduct resulted in the court’s finding.

Does citing a case that doesn’t exist count against a filer?

It can. Citing fictitious legal authority is one of the kinds of conduct the rule names. It also breaks the certification every signer makes under Rule 11(B) or Rule 11.1(C) that any cited legal authority is authentic.

Source & verification. The rule text is reproduced verbatim from the official Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure (T.R. 11.2). Prescribed by the Supreme Court of Indiana, under its inherent constitutional rulemaking power (reaffirmed by Ind. Code 34-8-1-1 and 34-8-2-1); originally enacted by the Indiana General Assembly in 1969. The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified September 28, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: trial rule 11.2 indianaabusive litigant indianavexatious litigant indianafiling restrictions order indianasanctions for fictitious citations indianafrivolous repetitive lawsuits indianafee waiver denied abusive litigant indiana