(a) Statement of Purpose. This rule is promulgated to insure that counsel who are appointed by the court to participate in child custody, allocation of parental responsibilities, visitation, and parenting time matters, as delineated in Rule 900(b)(2), possess the ability, knowledge, and experience to do so in a competent and professional manner. To this end, each circuit court of this state shall develop a set of qualifications and educational requirements for attorneys appointed by the court to represent children in child custody and allocation of parental responsibilities cases and guardianship cases when custody or visitation is an issue and shall further develop a plan for the procurement of qualified attorneys in accordance with the plan.
Rule 906.Attorney Qualifications and Education in Child Custody, Allocation of Parental Responsibilities, Visitation, and Parenting Time Matters
Article IX. Child Custody or Allocation of Parental Responsibilities Proceedings · Part A. Rules of General Application to Child Custody or Allocation of Parental Responsibilities Proceedings · Last amended 2023 · Last verified July 20, 2026
In one sentenceRule 906 directs each judicial circuit to set qualification and continuing-education standards for attorneys the court appoints to represent children in custody cases, with reciprocity for attorneys approved elsewhere in Illinois.
Full Text of Ill. S. Ct. R. 906
(b) Submission of Qualifications and Plan. The Chief Judge of a judicial circuit shall be responsible for the creation of the qualifications and Plan and for submitting them to the Conference of Chief Judges for approval. The Chief Judges of two or more contiguous judicial circuits may submit a Plan for the creation of a single set of qualifications and Plan encompassing those judicial circuits or encompassing contiguous counties within the circuits.
(c) Qualifications and Plan. The qualifications shall provide that the attorney is licensed and in good standing with the Illinois Supreme Court. Certification requirements may address minimum experience requirements for attorneys appointed by the court to represent minor children. In addition, the qualifications may include one or all of the following which are recommended: (1) Prior to appointment the attorney shall have 10 hours in the two years prior to the date the attorney qualifies for appointment in approved continuing legal education courses in the following areas: child development; roles of guardian ad litem and child representative; ethics in child custody and allocation of parental responsibilities cases; relevant substantive state, federal, and case law in custody, allocation of parental responsibilities, visitation, and parenting time matters; implicit bias; family dynamics, including substance abuse, domestic abuse, and mental health issues. (2) Periodic continuing education in approved child related courses shall be required to maintain qualification as an attorney eligible to be appointed by the court in child custody, allocation of parental responsibilities, visitation, and parenting time cases. (3) Requirements for initial pro bono representation. (4) Attorneys who work for governmental agencies may meet the requirements of this rule by attending appropriate in-house legal education classes.
(d) Conference of Chief Judges Review and Approval. The Conference of Chief Judges shall review and approve the Plan or may request that the Chief Judge modify the submitted list of qualifications and Plan. Upon approval, the Chief Judge of each circuit shall be responsible for administering the program and insuring compliance. An attorney approved to be appointed by the Court to participate in child custody, allocation of parental responsibilities, visitation, and parenting time matters under a Plan approved in one county or judicial circuit shall have reciprocity to participate in child custody, allocation of parental responsibilities, visitation, and parenting time matters in other counties and judicial circuits in Illinois.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 906 treats appointed child representation as a role that demands proven competence, not just a law license. Each circuit must build a set of qualifications and a plan for finding and appointing qualified attorneys to represent children in custody and allocation-of-parental-responsibilities cases, including related guardianship matters.
The chief judge submits that plan to the Conference of Chief Judges for approval, and neighboring circuits can join together on a shared plan. Recommended qualifications include continuing legal education in areas like child development, ethics, implicit bias, and family dynamics — both before an attorney takes a first appointment and on an ongoing basis afterward.
An attorney approved under one circuit’s plan does not have to requalify to take appointments elsewhere in Illinois; the rule gives them reciprocity across circuits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who decides which attorneys can represent children in custody cases?
Each judicial circuit builds its own qualifications and plan, which the Conference of Chief Judges then reviews and approves.
What training do attorneys need to represent a child in a custody case?
Recommended topics include child development, the roles of a guardian ad litem and child representative, ethics, implicit bias, and family dynamics such as substance abuse and domestic violence.
If an attorney is qualified in one county, can they take cases in another county?
Yes. Rule 906 gives attorneys approved under one circuit’s plan reciprocity to participate in other Illinois counties and circuits.
Do government attorneys have to meet the same training requirements?
They can satisfy the rule through appropriate in-house legal education classes offered by their agency.
Who pays for an attorney appointed to represent my child?
Funding varies by circuit — some rely on party contributions, filing fees, or pro bono service, since Rule 906 doesn’t itself provide state funding.
Committee Comments
(Revised March 8, 2016)
Special Supreme Court Committee on Child Custody Issues Paragraph (a) requires each judicial circuit to establish qualifications and educational requirements for attorneys who are appointed by a court to represent children in child custody and allocation of parental responsibilities proceedings. The circuits would also be required to establish a plan for procuring the services of qualified attorneys for child custody and allocation of parental responsibilities cases. Paragraph (b) requires that attorney qualification and procurement plans be submitted to the Conference of Chief Circuit Judges for approval. It also provides that attorney qualification and procurement plans may be drafted to apply to contiguous circuits or to contiguous counties within two or more circuits. Paragraph (c) specifies that attorneys appointed to represent children must be licensed and in good standing as attorneys. It also provides that the qualifications and standards must include a minimum experience requirement, and may include criteria concerning initial and continuing legal education requirements and requirements for initial pro bono representation. Attorneys approved under a circuit plan would be eligible for appointment in cases in other areas of the state on the basis of reciprocity.
In writing Rule 906, the Special Committee considered Rule 714, Capital Litigation Trial Bar, which imposes minimum requirements upon trial counsel in order to insure that counsel who participate in capital cases possess the ability, knowledge and experience to do so in a competent and professional manner. The Special Committee believes that cases involving child custody, allocation of parental responsibilities, visitation and parenting time issues demand the same high standards of advocacy as do capital cases.
The Special Committee is mindful that many judicial circuits will find it very difficult to find funds to pay for the plans under which counsel are appointed. Ideally, the State would provide sufficient funding to reimburse the private attorneys who are appointed by the court. In the absence of such funding, the individual judicial circuits will need to be innovative in meeting the financial requirements of the plans. In addition to requiring the parties to pay for the appointed lawyer’s services, the local rules could provide for the targeting of court filing fees. Voluntary pro bono service is also strongly encouraged.
Amendment History
Adopted February 10, 2006, effective July 1, 2006; amended Mar. 8, 2016, eff. immediately; amended Feb. 27, 2023, eff. immediately.
Source & verification. Rule text, official Committee Comments, and
amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Illinois Supreme Court Rules,
promulgated by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Last verified July 20, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as: guardian ad litem qualifications Illinoisattorney for child requirements custody casechild representative training requirementshow are GAL attorneys certified