9-216.Remedies available to lessee.
Article IX. Eviction · Part 2. Recovery of Rent; · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/9-216
Plain-English Summary
Section 9-216 is the counterpart to the section just before it, running continuity of remedy the other direction. Lessees, their assigns, and their personal representatives have the same remedy, by action or otherwise, against the lessor's grantees, assignees, or representatives, for breach of any agreement in the lease, that the lessee would have had against the immediate lessor.
The scope matches Section 9-215's: the remedy covers breach of any agreement in the lease, giving a tenant recourse against whoever now stands in the landlord's position, not only the original signer of the lease.
The section carves out an important limit. It does not extend to covenants against encumbrances, or to claims relating to the title or possession of the demised premises -- those stay outside this continuity rule, so a tenant cannot chase a remote successor landlord over a title defect the same way as an ordinary lease breach.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who benefits from Section 9-216?
Lessees, their assigns, and their personal representatives.
Whom can they sue under this section?
The lessor's grantees, assignees, or personal representatives, for breach of any agreement in the lease.
Is this remedy the same as what the tenant could have claimed against the original landlord?
Yes. The statute gives the same remedy the lessee would have had against the immediate lessor.
What claims does this section not cover?
Covenants against encumbrances, and matters relating to the title or possession of the demised premises.
How does this section relate to Section 9-215?
It is the counterpart provision, giving similar continuity of remedy to the lessee's side rather than the landlord's side.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)