9-202.Wilfully holding over.
Article IX. Eviction · Part 2. Recovery of Rent; · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/9-202
Plain-English Summary
Section 9-202 penalizes a specific kind of bad behavior: staying on the property on purpose after the lease has run and after the landlord has made a written demand for possession. The person who does this -- whether the named tenant or someone who took possession by, from, under, or in collusion with the tenant -- owes double the yearly value of the property for as long as the rightful owner is kept out.
Two things have to happen before the double-value liability attaches: the lease term has to expire, and the landlord or the person entitled to the reversion has to make a written demand for possession. Staying past the lease date alone is not enough; the statute targets willful holding over after that demand.
The reach of the section extends past the named tenant to anyone claiming through that tenant, closing off an easy way to dodge the penalty by handing possession to a relative, subtenant, or associate. The double-value amount is collected through its own civil action, separate from any proceeding to regain possession of the property.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as willfully holding over under Section 9-202?
Staying in possession after the lease term has expired and after the landlord makes a written demand for the property back.
How much can the landlord recover?
Double the yearly value of the property, for the time the landlord or rightful owner is kept out of possession.
Does the double-value penalty reach only the named tenant?
No. It also covers anyone in possession by, from, or under the tenant, or acting in collusion with the tenant.
Is a written demand required before this penalty applies?
Yes. The landlord must make a written demand for possession before the double-value liability attaches.
Does this section itself evict the holdover tenant?
No. It creates a money remedy, recovered through a separate civil action, rather than a process for regaining the property.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 83-707.)