8-2701.Admissibility of evidence; out of court statements; elder abuse.
Article VIII. Evidence · Part 27. Elder Adults · Last amended 2013 · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/8-2701
Plain-English Summary
This section covers an "eligible adult," as defined in the Adult Protective Services Act, who has been diagnosed by a physician with dementia, a developmental disability, another form of mental incapacity, or a physical infirmity that prevents the person's appearance in court. An out-of-court statement by that eligible adult describing elder abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation, or testimony that the eligible adult complained of such acts to another, is admissible in a civil proceeding under the same structure Section 8-2601 uses for children: a hearing outside the jury's presence finding sufficient reliability safeguards in the statement's time, content, and circumstances, and either the eligible adult testifying or being unavailable with corroborative evidence of the act.
As with the child hearsay exception, the jury is instructed to weigh the statement's credibility considering the eligible adult's condition, the statement's nature and circumstances, and other relevant factors, and the party offering the statement must give the adverse party reasonable notice of that intent and the statement's particulars.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is an "eligible adult" for purposes of this section?
A person defined as an eligible adult under the Adult Protective Services Act who has been diagnosed by a physician with dementia, a developmental disability, another form of mental incapacity, or a physical infirmity preventing court appearance.
What kind of statement does this section admit?
An out-of-court statement by the eligible adult describing elder abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation, or testimony that the eligible adult complained of such acts to someone else.
What conditions must be met before the statement comes in?
A hearing outside the jury's presence finding sufficient reliability safeguards in the statement's time, content, and circumstances, plus either the eligible adult testifying or being unavailable with corroborative evidence of the act.
How does this section compare to the child hearsay exception?
It follows the same structure — reliability hearing, testify-or-corroborate requirement, jury instruction on weight and credibility, and advance notice to the adverse party — applied to eligible adults instead of children under 13.
Does the statement have to describe physical abuse only?
No — it can describe elder abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 98-49, eff. 7-1-13.)