RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

4-102.Construed for detection of fraud.

Article IV. Attachment · Part 1. In General · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026

In one sentenceCourts must read the entire attachment article with an eye toward uncovering fraud, giving judges room to favor creditors over debtors who are trying to hide or move assets.

Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/4-102

Text size

This Act shall be construed in all courts in the most liberal manner for the detection of fraud.

Plain-English Summary

Section 4-102 is a one-sentence interpretive rule, but it shapes how every other section in this Part gets applied. It tells courts to construe the attachment statute in the most liberal manner for detecting fraud.

That instruction matters because so many of the grounds in Section 4-101 turn on a debtor's intent -- to conceal, to remove property, to hinder creditors. Proving intent is hard, and this section signals that judges should not read the statute narrowly against creditors trying to make that showing. It works alongside provisions like Section 4-133, which forgives a creditor's choice of the wrong remedy, and Section 4-137, which still requires the creditor to prove a ground and a likelihood of success at a prompt hearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Section 4-102 require courts to do?

It directs courts to construe the attachment article in the most liberal manner for detecting fraud, favoring an interpretation that helps expose a debtor's fraudulent conduct.

Does this section create a new ground for attachment?

No. It is a rule of construction, not an independent basis for relief. The grounds themselves are listed in Section 4-101.

Does a liberal-construction rule mean debtors have no protections in attachment cases?

No. Other sections in this Part, including the bond requirement in Section 4-107 and the prompt hearing in Section 4-137, still protect debtors even under a fraud-detecting reading of the statute.

Why would the legislature single out fraud detection for special treatment?

Attachment exists largely to reach debtors who are hiding, moving, or disposing of property to escape their creditors, so several grounds in Section 4-101 depend on proving fraudulent intent -- this section tells courts not to read those provisions narrowly.

Is this section limited to the fraud-based grounds in Section 4-101?

The text refers to the Act generally, so its liberal-construction instruction is not confined to any single ground -- but it carries the most weight where fraud must be shown or inferred.

Amendment History

(Source: P.A. 82-280.)

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Illinois Compiled Statutes, published by the Illinois Compiled Statutes, Illinois General Assembly / Legislative Reference Bureau. Last verified July 20, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: illinois attachment construction ruleliberal construction fraud illinoisattachment statute interpretationdetection of fraud statute