4-102.Construed for detection of fraud.
Article IV. Attachment · Part 1. In General · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/4-102
Plain-English Summary
Section 4-102 is a one-sentence interpretive rule, but it shapes how every other section in this Part gets applied. It tells courts to construe the attachment statute in the most liberal manner for detecting fraud.
That instruction matters because so many of the grounds in Section 4-101 turn on a debtor's intent -- to conceal, to remove property, to hinder creditors. Proving intent is hard, and this section signals that judges should not read the statute narrowly against creditors trying to make that showing. It works alongside provisions like Section 4-133, which forgives a creditor's choice of the wrong remedy, and Section 4-137, which still requires the creditor to prove a ground and a likelihood of success at a prompt hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Section 4-102 require courts to do?
It directs courts to construe the attachment article in the most liberal manner for detecting fraud, favoring an interpretation that helps expose a debtor's fraudulent conduct.
Does this section create a new ground for attachment?
No. It is a rule of construction, not an independent basis for relief. The grounds themselves are listed in Section 4-101.
Does a liberal-construction rule mean debtors have no protections in attachment cases?
Why would the legislature single out fraud detection for special treatment?
Attachment exists largely to reach debtors who are hiding, moving, or disposing of property to escape their creditors, so several grounds in Section 4-101 depend on proving fraudulent intent -- this section tells courts not to read those provisions narrowly.
Is this section limited to the fraud-based grounds in Section 4-101?
The text refers to the Act generally, so its liberal-construction instruction is not confined to any single ground -- but it carries the most weight where fraud must be shown or inferred.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)