2-614.Joinder of causes of action and use of counterclaims.
Article II. Civil Practice · Part 6. Pleading · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/2-614
Plain-English Summary
Section 2-614 opens the door wide on joinder. Subsection (a) lets a plaintiff join any causes of action against any defendant, and lets a defendant set up in the answer any cross claims at all -- whether recoupment, setoff, or otherwise -- designating them as counterclaims. The section doesn't limit how many claims or how varied they can be.
Subsection (b) gives the court a release valve: if a joined cause of action, counterclaim, or third-party claim can't conveniently be handled with the rest of the case, the court can order it tried separately. And where no jury is involved, legal and equitable issues can be tried together in the same proceeding, rather than split across separate tracks.
This section works hand in hand with 2-608's counterclaim rules and 2-613's provisions on pleading multiple claims and defenses -- together they describe how broadly a single Illinois lawsuit can grow before a court steps in to manage it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many claims can a plaintiff join in one Illinois lawsuit?
Any causes of action against any defendant or defendants. Section 2-614(a) does not cap the number or restrict the type of claims that can be joined.
What kinds of counterclaims can a defendant raise?
Any cross claims at all, whether in the nature of recoupment, setoff, or otherwise, designated as counterclaims in the answer.
Can a court separate joined claims for trial?
Yes. If a cause of action, counterclaim, or third-party claim can't be conveniently disposed of with the rest of the issues, the court may order it tried separately.
Can legal and equitable claims be tried together?
Yes, when no jury is employed. Subsection (b) allows legal and equitable issues to be tried together in that circumstance.
Does joining many claims risk jury confusion in Illinois practice?
The statute leaves that judgment to the trial court, which can order separate trials under subsection (b) whenever convenience calls for it.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)