2-601.Substance of pleadings.
Article II. Civil Practice · Part 6. Pleading · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/2-601
Plain-English Summary
Section 2-601 is a pointer, not a standard. It tells every litigant where to look for the rules that govern how a complaint, answer, or reply must be built: the rest of Article II and the Illinois Supreme Court Rules that supplement it. Nothing in this section relaxes or expands what a party must allege to state a claim.
The second sentence does the real work. It preserves whatever substantive facts a cause of action requires, no matter what the surrounding sections say about form, numbering, or style. A complaint that hits every formatting rule in this Part still fails if it skips a fact the underlying cause of action demands.
Read together with 2-603 and 2-612, this section frames Illinois's approach to pleading: form and structure are governed by statute and rule, but the substance of a claim is governed by the law that creates it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 2-601 require of a pleading?
It requires conformity with Article II of the Code and the applicable Supreme Court Rules. It does not itself list any formatting or content rule -- those live in the sections around it, like 2-603 and 2-612.
Does 2-601 change what facts a complaint must allege?
No. The section expressly says it does not affect the substantial allegations of fact a cause of action needs. Those requirements come from the substantive law creating the claim, not from this procedural section.
Why does the Code include a section that mostly just points elsewhere?
It sets the baseline before the more specific rules follow: form of pleadings, verification, exhibits, amendments, and the rest of Part 6. Later sections build on the general conformity this section establishes.
Is 2-601 the source of Illinois's fact-pleading standard?
No single sentence here creates that standard. The fact-pleading requirement comes from the combination of 2-603 (plain and concise statement) and the substantive law of each cause of action, which 2-601 preserves rather than displaces.
Can a court dismiss a complaint solely for violating 2-601?
Rarely in practice. Dismissal motions typically cite the specific defect -- insufficiency in law under 2-615, or a defect like the statute of limitations under 2-619 -- rather than a bare violation of this general conformity provision.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)