2-1207.Punitive damages.
Article II. Civil Practice · Part 12. Post-Trial · Last amended 1997 · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/2-1207
Plain-English Summary
If a jury's punitive-damages award looks excessive, the trial court has discretion to order a remittitur paired with a conditional new trial, rather than leaving the full award standing or ordering a new trial outright.
The court can also divide the punitive award among the plaintiff, the plaintiff's attorney, and the Illinois Department of Human Services. The attorney's share must be reasonable, set without regard to any contingent-fee contract, except that it can't exceed what that contract would authorize.
In deciding how to apportion the award, the court weighs whatever factors it deems relevant, including whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a special duty.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an Illinois judge reduce a jury's punitive damages award?
Yes, through a remittitur if the award is excessive, paired with a conditional new trial.
Who can receive a share of punitive damages in Illinois?
The court may apportion the award among the plaintiff, the plaintiff's attorney, and the Illinois Department of Human Services.
Does the plaintiff's attorney automatically get their contingent-fee percentage of punitive damages?
No. The amount must be reasonable and set without regard to the contingent-fee contract, except that it can't exceed what the contract would authorize.
What does the court consider when apportioning a punitive damages award?
Any factors it deems relevant, including whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a special duty.
What is a conditional new trial in this context?
It's paired with a remittitur -- if the reduced award isn't accepted, a new trial follows.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 89-507, eff. 7-1-97.)