17-101.Compelling partition.
Article XVII. Partition · Last amended 2019 · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/17-101
Plain-English Summary
This section opens Article XVII by naming who can sue and where. Any one or more co-owners of land held in joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or another form of co-ownership may compel a partition by verified complaint in the circuit court of the county where the property, or part of it, sits. The right runs regardless of whether the co-owners are minors or adults. Property governed instead by the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act follows that Act's own process, and this section carves it out rather than folding it in.
When the land spans two or more counties, the plaintiff may file in any one of them. Whichever court first takes up the case keeps sole and exclusive jurisdiction over it, so a co-owner cannot restart the fight in a second county after another has already begun hearing it.
The rest of the section addresses split mineral and surface estates. Owning a surface interest doesn't block a co-owner of the minerals below from seeking partition of the mineral estate, and the reverse holds too: a mineral owner's interest doesn't stop a surface co-owner from partitioning the surface. The same logic extends to co-owned minerals themselves — owning only some of several minerals doesn't prevent partition of that co-owned mineral estate. The General Assembly added this language to confirm existing law on mineral partition rather than to change it, and it says so directly. It also makes clear that none of this lets a coal-mineral owner strip and remove coal by surface mining without first getting every surface owner's consent.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can file a partition action in Illinois?
Any one or more of the co-owners interested in land held in joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or another form of co-ownership may file a verified complaint to compel partition.
Where do I file a partition complaint?
In the circuit court of the county where the land, or part of it, is located. If the land spans two or more counties, you may file in any one of them, and the court that first takes the case keeps exclusive jurisdiction over it.
Does owning only the mineral rights, and not the surface, block a partition of the minerals?
No. A co-owner's interest in the surface doesn't prevent partition of the mineral estate below it, and a co-owner's mineral interest doesn't prevent partition of the surface.
Can a coal owner strip-mine the property without the surface owners' consent under this section?
No. The section states plainly that nothing in it allows removing coal by surface mining without first getting the consent of every surface owner.
Does this section apply to property covered by the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act?
No. The section expressly excludes property governed by that Act, which follows its own separate procedure.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 101-520, eff. 8-23-19.)