12-634.Determining money of the claim.
Article XII. Judgments - Enforcement · Part 6. Foreign Judgments and Foreign-Money Claims · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/12-634
Plain-English Summary
When a contract specifies the currency of payment, subsection (a) makes that the money of the claim — no guesswork needed. The harder question is what happens when the parties never said.
Subsection (b) supplies three fallback tests: the currency the parties regularly used with each other, the currency that trade usage or common practice assigns to that kind of transaction, or the currency in which the claimant's loss was, or will be, felt. These tests aren't ranked in strict order; the section says a court applies whichever is appropriate to the case.
This section reaches beyond contract claims to any foreign-money claim, including one arising from a loss rather than a promise to pay, which is why the third test asks where the loss lands rather than what a contract says.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the contract is silent on currency?
The court applies the default tests in subsection (b): the parties' regular usage or course of dealing, trade usage for that kind of transaction, or the currency in which the loss was ultimately felt.
What does “the money in which the loss was ultimately felt” mean?
It points to the currency in which the claimant absorbed the economic loss, which can matter for a claim that doesn't rest on a contract price at all, such as a tort claim.
Who decides the money of the claim, the judge or the jury?
Section 12-636(d) answers that directly: the money of the claim is a question of law for the court.
Does this section apply to torts as well as contracts?
Yes. The definition of “foreign-money claim” in Section 12-631 covers a claim for recovery of a loss, not only a contractual obligation to pay.
Can the parties' course of dealing settle the currency question on its own?
Yes, if they regularly used a particular currency between themselves, that usage is one of the tests a court applies when the contract itself is silent.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 86-1291.)