10-128.Person discharged again imprisoned.
Article X. Habeas Corpus · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/10-128
Plain-English Summary
Section 10-128 gives a discharged person a real, if bounded, protection. No person discharged by order of the court on habeas corpus shall again be imprisoned, restrained, or held in custody for the same cause, unless that person is afterward indicted for the same offense, or unless it's by the legal order or process of the court where that person is bound by recognizance to appear.
The section then narrows what counts as the "same cause" through three examples. If a person was discharged in a criminal case for a defect of proof or a material defect in the commitment, and is later arrested on sufficient proof and committed by legal process for the same offense, that isn't the same cause. If, in a civil action, the party was discharged for illegality in the judgment or process, and is afterward imprisoned by legal process for the same cause of action, that too falls outside the protection. And generally, whenever a discharge rests on a failure to observe required legal forms, the party may be imprisoned a second time if the underlying cause is legal and those forms are observed the second time around.
Taken together, these examples show the protection targets repeated confinement on the identical, uncorrected legal footing — not a properly corrected commitment that fixes whatever flaw led to the earlier discharge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What basic protection does Section 10-128 give a person discharged on habeas corpus?
Protection against being reimprisoned, restrained, or held in custody again for the same cause.
What two things can override that protection?
A later indictment for the same offense, or the legal order or process of the court where the person is bound by recognizance to appear.
Does correcting a defective commitment and rearresting on sufficient proof count as reimprisoning for the "same cause"?
No. Section 10-128 states that situation is not deemed the same cause.
Does Section 10-128 address civil custody as well as criminal custody?
Yes. It separately addresses a civil action discharge for illegality in the judgment or process, followed by lawful reimprisonment for the same cause of action.
What is the general principle behind all three carve-outs?
That a discharge for failing to observe required legal forms doesn't bar a second, properly formed imprisonment on a legal cause.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)