Rule 707.Informal Trial
Part VII. Pre-Trial and Trial Procedure · Last amended July 1, 2021 · Last verified September 4, 2026
Full Text of Rule 707
Rule History
(Adopted March 29, 2021, effective July 1, 2021.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 707 is the most distinctive rule in these procedures.
What it is
An optional alternative trial procedure, voluntarily agreed to by the parties, the attorneys, and the court, for trying child custody and child support issues. All three must agree.
The model requires waiving two things: the application of the Idaho Rules of Evidence and the normal question and answer manner of trial. Hearsay objections, foundation requirements, and lawyer-conducted examination all go.
How it runs
Once the waiver is obtained, the matter proceeds by consent:
- the moving party speaks to the court under oath about what they want on custody and support — not questioned by the attorney, but the court may question to develop the evidence the Rule 120 guidelines and the child's best interest require;
- the court then asks that party's attorney whether there are other areas to inquire about, and covers them;
- the process repeats for the other party;
- any Guardian ad Litem or other expert's report is entered as the court's exhibit, and either party may have the expert sworn and questioned by the attorneys, parties, or court;
- the parties may present any documents they want considered, with the court deciding what weight to give each, and may be ordered to supplement;
- the parties are offered a chance to respond briefly to each other's comments;
- attorneys or self-represented parties make legal argument; and
- the court makes a decision.
Why it exists
The ordinary trial format asks a parent to make their case through counsel's questions and to have their account tested by opposing counsel's. Rule 707 lets each parent tell the judge directly what they want and why, with the judge — not the lawyers — doing the probing. It shortens hearings, reduces cost, and lowers the temperature between people who will co-parent afterward.
The trade is real: no evidentiary objections, no cross-examination of the other parent, and no appellate argument that inadmissible material was considered. Waiving the rules of evidence waives the error that would flow from them.
Consent
The consent and waiver must be given verbally on the record under oath or in writing on a form adopted by the Supreme Court.
Note the reach: custody and child support only. Property, debt and maintenance are tried in the ordinary way.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an informal trial?
Rule 707(a) describes an optional alternative trial procedure voluntarily agreed to by the parties, attorneys and the court to try child custody and child support issues, requiring waiver of the Idaho Rules of Evidence and of the normal question and answer manner of trial.
Will I be cross-examined?
No. Rule 707(a)(1) has the party speak to the court under oath, not questioned by the attorney but subject to questioning by the court. Rule 707(a)(2) then lets that party's attorney suggest further areas for the court to inquire about.
What issues can be tried this way?
Rule 707(a) limits the informal trial model to child custody and child support issues.
Can I still submit documents?
Yes. Rule 707(a)(5) allows the parties to present any documents they want the court to consider, with the court determining what weight to give each, and allows the court to order the record supplemented.
What happens to an evaluator's report?
Rule 707(a)(4) enters the report of a Guardian ad Litem or other expert into evidence as the court's exhibit, and allows either party to have the expert sworn and questioned by the attorneys, parties or the court.
How is consent given?
Rule 707(b) requires the consent and waiver to be given verbally on the record under oath or in writing on a form adopted by the Supreme Court.