RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 706.Taking Testimony

Part VII. Pre-Trial and Trial Procedure · Last amended January 1, 2026 · Last verified September 4, 2026

In one sentenceRule 706 requires testimony in open court, allows video conferencing, and governs direct and cross-examination, court questioning, and recalling witnesses.

Full Text of Rule 706

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k)

(a) In Open Court. At trial or an evidentiary hearing, witness testimony must be taken in open court unless a statute, these rules, the Idaho Rules of Evidence, other rules or orders adopted by the Idaho Supreme Court provide otherwise. The court may permit testimony in open court through the use of video conferencing.
(b) Affirmations. When these rules require an oath, a solemn affirmation is sufficient.
(c) Interpreter. If any party, or person the party intends to call as a witness, needs an interpreter as provided in I.C.A.R. 52, the party must notify the court at least 14 days before commencement of the court proceeding, or as soon as practicable in the event of an expedited hearing.
(d) Direct and Cross-Examination. The questioning of a witness by the party calling the witness is called the direct examination; the questioning of the same witness by the other party is called the cross-examination. The direct examination must be completed before the cross-examination begins, unless the court allows otherwise.
(e) Limitation on Examination. Only one attorney on each side must conduct the examination of a witness until such examination is completed, unless the court grants permission for other attorneys to conduct the examination.
(f) Calling by Court. When the court is the trier of fact, the court may call witnesses on its own or at a party’s request. Each party is entitled to cross-examine the witness.
(g) Examination by Court. The court may examine a witness regardless of who calls the witness.
(h) Objection. A party wishing to object to the court examining a witness must do so at the time of the examination.
(i) Reexamination and Recalling of Witnesses. After a witness has been examined, they cannot be reexamined as to the same matter without permission of the court. The witness may be reexamined as to any new matter on which the witness has been examined by the adverse party. A witness, after being examined by the party who called the witness and adverse party, cannot be recalled by the same party without permission of the court. This rule does not preclude the adverse party from calling such witness as that party's own witness for direct examination.
(j) View of Premises, Property, or Things. During a trial, the court may order that the court may view any property, place, item, or circumstance relevant to the action. A viewing by the court must be conducted personally by the court after notice to all parties. Attorneys have the right to be present at any viewing by the court.
(k) Inspection of Writings. Whenever a writing is shown to a witness it may be inspected by any other party.
End

Rule History

(Adopted March 29, 2021 , effective July 1, 2021; amended November 6, 2025, effective January 1, 2026.)

Plain-English Summary

Rule 706 is the courtroom rule.

Open court

At trial or an evidentiary hearing, testimony must be taken in open court unless a statute, these rules, the Idaho Rules of Evidence, or another Supreme Court rule or order provides otherwise. The court may permit testimony in open court through video conferencing — which is different from Rule 116's telephone or video appearance at a hearing. Here the witness is testifying, and the video link is a way of appearing in the open courtroom, not of avoiding it.

Rule 113 governs who may be present; Rule 117 handles a child's statement.

Oaths and interpreters

Where these rules require an oath, a solemn affirmation is sufficient. A party who, or whose witness, needs an interpreter under I.C.A.R. 52 must notify the court at least 14 days before the proceeding, or as soon as practicable for an expedited hearing.

Examination

Direct examination is by the calling party, cross-examination by the other, and direct must be completed before cross begins unless the court allows otherwise. Only one attorney on each side conducts the examination of a witness until it is complete, absent permission — so a case cannot be tag-teamed across a single witness.

The court's own role

When the court is the trier of fact — which in family law is nearly always — it may call witnesses on its own or at a party's request, and each party is entitled to cross-examine. The court may examine a witness regardless of who calls them.

And the objection provision is short and strict: a party wishing to object to the court examining a witness must do so at the time of the examination. There is no later cure.

Recalling

After a witness has been examined they cannot be reexamined as to the same matter without permission, though reexamination as to any new matter raised by the adverse party is allowed. A witness examined by both sides cannot be recalled by the same party without permission — but nothing prevents the adverse party from calling that witness as its own for direct examination.

Two more

During trial the court may order a view of any property, place, item, or circumstance relevant to the action. The view must be conducted personally by the court after notice to all parties, and attorneys have the right to be present.

And whenever a writing is shown to a witness, it may be inspected by any other party.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a witness testify by video?

Rule 706(a) requires testimony to be taken in open court unless otherwise provided, and allows the court to permit testimony in open court through the use of video conferencing.

Can the judge question a witness?

Yes. Rule 706(g) allows the court to examine a witness regardless of who calls the witness, and Rule 706(f) allows the court, when it is the trier of fact, to call witnesses on its own or at a party's request, with each party entitled to cross-examine.

When must I object to the court's questioning?

Rule 706(h) requires a party wishing to object to the court examining a witness to do so at the time of the examination.

Can I recall a witness?

Rule 706(i) provides that a witness cannot be reexamined as to the same matter without permission of the court, may be reexamined as to any new matter raised by the adverse party, and cannot be recalled by the same party without permission, though the adverse party may call that witness as its own.

How much notice does an interpreter need?

Rule 706(c) requires the party to notify the court at least 14 days before commencement of the proceeding, or as soon as practicable in the event of an expedited hearing.

Can the judge visit a property?

Rule 706(j) allows the court during a trial to order that it may view any property, place, item or circumstance relevant to the action, conducted personally by the court after notice to all parties, with attorneys having the right to be present.

Source & verification. Rule text and Rule History reproduced verbatim from the Idaho Rules of Family Law Procedure as published by the Idaho Supreme Court, current through amendments effective July 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Idaho (Idaho Const. art. V, sec. 25). Last verified September 4, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: taking testimonyopen courtvideo conferencingcross-examinationrecalling a witnessinterpreterview of premisesaffirmation