Rule 103.Definitions
Part I. General Administration · Last amended July 1, 2021 · Last verified September 4, 2026
Full Text of Rule 103
Rule History
(Adopted March 29, 2021, effective July 1, 2021.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 103 is the vocabulary rule. Most of it is unremarkable, and three entries are not.
Conferring means talking
To confer is to speak directly with the opposing attorney or self-represented party, in person or by telephone, to identify and discuss a disputed issue, and to make a reasonable effort to resolve it. The rule then says it outright: sending electronic or voicemail communication does not satisfy the requirement. Both sides owe a reasonable response and reasonable availability. The one exception is an incarcerated self-represented party, for whom written communication suffices.
There is no order to show cause
A motion is a written request made after a petition seeking relief is filed — and the definition adds a flat sentence: there is no procedure for Order to Show Cause. Practitioners arriving from other states, or from Idaho civil practice, should note that the device simply does not exist here.
The party names never change
A petitioner is the person who files the first petition and must be referred to as such in all subsequent documents, including every post-decree petition and motion in the same case. So the caption does not flip when the respondent later brings a modification. To describe who is doing what at any given moment the rule supplies two more terms: the moving party is whoever filed the current request, and the responding party is whoever must answer it — each defined regardless of which was petitioner or respondent originally.
The rest
Definitions are also given for answer, civil protection order action, family law action, good cause, I.C.A.R., petition, relevant evidence, respondent, response, service of process, Title IV-D, venue and witness. Reference to a party may include the State. And throughout the rules, singular includes plural, plural includes singular, and words of any gender refer to any other gender.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does emailing opposing counsel satisfy a requirement to confer?
No. Rule 103(b)(3) requires speaking directly in person or by telephone, and states that the sending of electronic or voicemail communication does not satisfy the requirement to confer.
Is there an order to show cause in Idaho family law?
No. Rule 103(b)(7) defines a motion as a written request made after a petition seeking relief is filed, and states that there is no procedure for Order to Show Cause.
If I was the respondent, am I the petitioner when I file a modification?
No. Rule 103(b)(10) requires the original petitioner to be referred to as such in all subsequent documents, including post-decree petitions and motions. Rule 103(b)(8) calls whoever files the current request the moving party.
What counts as relevant evidence?
Rule 103(b)(11) defines evidence as relevant if it has the tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence and the fact is of consequence in determining the action.
What does conferring require if a party is in custody?
Rule 103(b)(3) provides that for cases where a self-represented party is incarcerated, a written communication will satisfy the requirement to confer.