Rule 27.Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal.
Current through July 1, 2026 · Last verified September 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 27
Amendment History
The Hawaiʻi State Judiciary’s compiled text of this rule carries no amendment order for this rule. For the adopting orders and any later amendments, see the Hawaiʻi State Judiciary’s rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Testimony that might be lost can be preserved before there is a case. A person who expects to be a party to an action cognizable in a Hawaii family court, but cannot bring it yet, files a verified petition in the circuit where an expected adverse party lives. The petition must set out the subject matter of the expected action and the petitioner interest, the facts to be established and why they need preserving, the expected adverse parties and their addresses so far as known, and the people to be examined with the substance of what each is expected to say.
Notice goes to each expected adverse party with a copy of the petition. If the court is satisfied that perpetuating the testimony may prevent a failure or delay of justice, it orders the depositions, designating who is to be examined and how. A deposition taken this way may be used in any later action in a Hawaii family court involving the same subject matter.
Subdivision (b) covers the period around an appeal. Once an appeal is taken from a family court judgment, or before it while the time still runs, the court that rendered the judgment may allow depositions to perpetuate testimony for use if the case comes back. The motion names the people to be examined, the substance of the expected testimony and the reasons. The rule ends by preserving the court separate power to entertain an action to perpetuate testimony.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I take a deposition before filing a family court case in Hawaii?
Yes, to perpetuate testimony, by verified petition in the family court of the circuit where an expected adverse party resides.
What must the petition say?
That the petitioner expects to be a party but cannot bring the action yet, the subject matter and the petitioner interest, the facts to be established and why they need preserving, the expected adverse parties, and the witnesses with the substance of their expected testimony.
What standard does the court apply?
Whether the perpetuation of the testimony may prevent a failure or delay of justice.
Can a deposition be taken while an appeal is pending?
Yes. The court that rendered the judgment may allow depositions to perpetuate testimony for use in the event of further proceedings.
Does this rule replace an action to perpetuate testimony?
No. Subdivision (c) says the rule does not limit the power of a court to entertain such an action.