Rule 61.Harmless Error
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 61
Amendment History
(Amended April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
Not every mistake at trial matters. Rule 61 tells courts to focus on consequences rather than perfection. Unless justice requires otherwise, no error in admitting or excluding evidence — and no other error by the court or a party — is a ground for granting a new trial, setting aside a verdict, or vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order.
The standard is whether the error affected a party’s substantial rights. At every stage of the case, the court must disregard errors and defects that do not. This harmless-error principle keeps litigation from being reopened over technical slips that did not change the outcome, and it shapes how appellate courts review trial rulings.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is harmless error?
An error that does not affect a party’s substantial rights. Under Rule 61, such errors must be disregarded and are not grounds for a new trial or for disturbing a judgment.
Who decides whether an error affected a party's substantial rights?
The court makes that call at every stage of the case, and appellate courts apply the same harmless-error standard when reviewing trial rulings.