Rule 59.New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment
Last amended December 1, 2009 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 59
Amendment History
(Amended December 27, 1946, effective March 19, 1948; February 28, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; April 27, 1995, effective December 1, 1995; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007; March 26, 2009, effective December 1, 2009.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 59 is the main tool for asking the trial court to reconsider after judgment. After a jury trial, the court may grant a new trial — on all or some issues — for any reason for which new trials have historically been granted, such as a verdict against the clear weight of the evidence or a prejudicial error. After a bench trial, it may grant a new trial for reasons for which rehearings have been granted, and may open the judgment, take more evidence, and enter a new one.
Timing is strict: a motion for a new trial, and a motion to alter or amend the judgment, must each be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment — a deadline the court cannot extend. The court may also order a new trial on its own within that period. Because these motions toll the time to appeal, Rule 59 is often the first stop before an appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline for a motion for a new trial?
No later than 28 days after the entry of judgment — a deadline that cannot be extended (Rule 59(b)).
What is a motion to alter or amend a judgment?
A Rule 59(e) motion asking the court to change its own judgment, filed within 28 days of entry; it is the usual vehicle for asking a trial court to reconsider.