Rule 5.806.Secure youth treatment facility baseline term
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 13. Cases Petitioned Under Sections 601 and 602 · Article 4. Disposition · Adopted 2023 · no amendments on record · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.806
| Category | Offense (Listed with reference to paragraph within section 707(b)) | Term |
|---|---|---|
| A |
| 4 to 7 years |
| B |
| 3 to 5 years |
| C |
| 2 to 4 years |
| D |
| 1 to 2 years |
Plain-English Summary
The baseline term is where the length of a secure commitment is decided. The court sets a term in months, years, or both, falling within the range for the offense category assigned to the most serious recent offense — the categories and ranges are in the matrix at the end of the rule, running from 4 to 7 years for the most serious offenses down to 1 to 2 years for the least.
Within that range the choice is individual, and the rule constrains it in three ways. The term must be no longer than necessary to meet the youth’s developmental needs and prepare them for discharge to community supervision. Factors outside the youth’s control must not produce a longer term than that objective needs. And the court must state its reasons on the record, referencing each criterion and any factor it deemed relevant.
Four criteria structure the decision, each with its own factors. The circumstances and gravity of the offense: its severity and statutory degree, the harm to victims, the youth’s role, the role of co-participants or victims, and any exculpatory circumstances — peer influence, immaturity or developmental delay, mental or physical impairment, or drug or alcohol impairment.
The youth’s prior history: their offense and commitment record, how earlier rehabilitation efforts fared, and the effects of family, community environment and childhood trauma on the behaviour that brought them into the system.
The confinement time reasonably necessary for rehabilitation: time already served and progress made, the facility’s capacity to provide suitable treatment and education, special needs in mental health, intellectual development, learning, or substance use recovery, whether the youth is pregnant, a parent or a primary caregiver, and what programs exist in the community for a later transition.
And the youth’s developmental history: age and maturity, developmental challenges including medical or health ones, child welfare and foster care history including abandonment, abuse or a parent’s incarceration, harmful childhood experiences including trauma, domestic or community violence and poverty, and discrimination experienced on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or other factors.
The term is not fixed once set. The court reviews progress at least every six months and may cut the baseline by up to six months at each review. To make that meaningful, every probation department running such a facility must operate a system that tracks positive behaviour regularly and systematically, and must report on it at every progress hearing with a recommendation on any downward adjustment — consulting and reporting the input of every other agency providing services to the youth.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
In developing the matrix for baseline terms required by Welfare and Institutions Code section 875, the committee sought to accomplish three primary goals that should serve as objectives for the court when setting a baseline term: positive youth development, public and community safety, and the establishment of flexible and fair commitment terms. A primary objective of a commitment to a secure youth treatment facility must be an evidence-based and trauma-responsive effort to promote healthy adolescent development. This objective will be achieved by providing positive incentives for prosocial behavior, focusing on the treatment needs of the youth to ensure healing and rehabilitation, and with a persistent focus on the end goal of successful reentry into the community. The flexibility inherent in the matrix is intended to result in a baseline term of commitment that is no longer than necessary to protect the public but is of sufficient length to assure the victim and the community that the harm committed can be redressed by the juvenile justice system in a developmentally appropriate manner and thus reduce the need for the youth to be transferred to criminal court. A baseline term should be based on the needs of the individual being committed and not simply the seriousness of the offense for which the youth was adjudicated. This individualized approach must be balanced with the goal of fair and just application of the matrix across California jurisdictions and an awareness that racial and ethnic disproportionality has been a failing of our juvenile justice system that all stakeholders must seek to remedy at each decision point. To advance this goal the advisory committee encourages juvenile courts and probation departments to monitor implementation of this rule to ensure that it is fairly and consistently applied.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the baseline term set?
Within the range for the offense category assigned to the most serious recent offense under the matrix in the rule, chosen on the individual facts and circumstances after working through four criteria, with the court’s reasons stated on the record.
Is there an upper limit on the term within the range?
Yes, in substance. The court must select a baseline term no longer than necessary to meet the youth’s developmental needs and prepare them for discharge to community supervision — and factors outside the youth’s control must not result in a longer term than that requires.
What can shorten the term?
At progress reviews held at least every six months, the court may modify the baseline term downward by up to six months at each hearing.
What must probation report about behaviour?
Each probation department operating a secure youth treatment facility must track the youth’s positive behaviour regularly and systematically and report on it at every progress hearing, with a recommendation on any downward adjustment — after consulting and reporting the input of all other agencies providing services to the youth.
Does the court consider a youth’s trauma history?
Yes, under two of the four criteria: the effects of family, community environment and childhood trauma on prior behaviour, and harmful childhood experiences including trauma, exposure to domestic or community violence, poverty, and discrimination.
Amendment History
Rule 5.806 adopted effective July 1, 2023.