RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.760.Detention hearing; report; grounds; determinations; findings; orders; factors to consider for detention; restraining orders

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 13. Cases Petitioned Under Sections 601 and 602 · Article 1. Initial Appearance · Last amended 2023 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.760 sets out the detention report, the five grounds for detaining a child, the findings and orders required, and the factors the court must weigh under each ground.

Full Text of Rule 5.760

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l)

(a) Conduct of detention hearing (§§ 635, 636)
The court must consider the written report of the probation officer and any other evidence and may examine the child, any parent or guardian, or any other person with relevant knowledge of the child.
(b) Written detention report (§§ 635, 636)
If the probation officer has reason to believe that the child is at risk of entering foster care placement, the probation officer must submit a written report to the court that includes the following:
(1) The reasons the child has been removed;
(2) Any prior referral for abuse or neglect of the child and any prior filing of a petition regarding the child under section 300;
(3) The need, if any, for continued detention;
(4) Available services to facilitate the return of the child;
(5) Whether there are any relatives able and willing to provide effective care and control over the child;
(6) Documentation that continuance in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare; and
(7) Documentation that reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home and documentation of the nature and results of the services provided.
(c) Grounds for detention (§§ 625.3, 635, 636)
(1) The child must be released unless the court finds that continuance in the home of the parent or legal guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare, and one or more of the following grounds for detention exist:
(A) The child has violated an order of the court;
(B) The child has escaped from a commitment of the court;
(C) The child is likely to flee the jurisdiction of the court;
(D) It is a matter of immediate and urgent necessity for the protection of the child; or
(E) It is reasonably necessary for the protection of the person or property of another.
(2) If the child is a dependent of the court under section 300, the court’s decision to detain must not be based on the child’s status as a dependent of the court or the child welfare services department’s inability to provide a placement for the child.
(3) The court may order the child placed on home supervision under the conditions stated in sections 628.1 and 636, or detained in juvenile hall or in a suitable place designated by the court.
(4) If the court orders the release of a child who is a dependent of the court under section 300, the court must order the child welfare services department either to ensure that the child’s current caregiver takes physical custody of the child or to take physical custody of the child and place the child in a licensed or approved placement.
(d) Required determinations before detention
Before detaining the child, the court must determine whether continuance in the home of the parent or legal guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare and whether there are available services that would prevent the need for further detention. The court must make these determinations on a case-by-case basis and must state the evidence relied on in reaching its decision.
(1) If the court determines that the child can be returned to the home of the parent or legal guardian through the provision of services, the court must release the child to the parent or guardian and order that the probation department provide the required services.
(2) If the child cannot be returned to the home of the parent or legal guardian, the court must state the facts on which the detention is based.
(e) Required findings to support detention (§ 636)
If the court orders the child detained, the court must make the following findings on the record and in the written order. The court must reference the probation officer’s report or other evidence relied on to make its determinations:
(1) Continuance in the home of the parent or guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare;
(2) Temporary placement and care is the responsibility of the probation officer pending disposition or further order of the court; and
(3) Reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child, or reasonable efforts were not made.
(f) Required orders to support detention (§ 636)
If the court orders the child detained, the court must make the following additional orders:
(1) As soon as possible, the probation officer must provide services that will enable the child’s parent or legal guardian to obtain such assistance as may be needed to effectively provide the care and control necessary for the child to return home; and
(2) The child’s placement and care must be the responsibility of the probation department pending disposition or further order of the court.
(g) Factors—violation of court order
Regarding the ground for detention in (c)(1)(A), the court must consider:
(1) The specificity of the court order alleged to have been violated;
(2) The nature and circumstances of the alleged violation;
(3) The severity and gravity of the alleged violation;
(4) Whether the alleged violation endangered the child or others;
(5) The prior history of the child as it relates to any failure to obey orders or directives of the court or probation officer;
(6) Whether there are means to ensure the child’s presence at any scheduled court hearing without detaining the child;
(7) The underlying conduct or offense that brought the child before the juvenile court; and
(8) The likelihood that if the petition is sustained, the child will be ordered removed from the custody of the parent or guardian at disposition.
(h) Factors—escape from commitment
Regarding the ground for detention in (c)(1)(B), the court must consider whether or not the child:
(1) Was committed to a county juvenile home, ranch, camp, forestry camp, secure youth treatment facility, or juvenile hall; and
(2) Escaped from the facility or the lawful custody of any officer or person in which the child was placed during commitment.
(i) Factors—likely to flee
Regarding the ground for detention in (c)(1)(C), the court must consider whether or not:
(1) The child has previously fled the jurisdiction of the court or failed to appear in court as ordered;
(2) There are means to ensure the child’s presence at any scheduled court hearing without detaining the child;
(3) The child promises to appear at any scheduled court hearing;
(4) The child has a prior history of failure to obey orders or directions of the court or the probation officer;
(5) The child is a resident of the county;
(6) The nature and circumstances of the alleged conduct or offense make it appear likely that the child would flee to avoid the jurisdiction of the court;
(7) The child’s home situation is so unstable as to make it appear likely that the child would flee to avoid the jurisdiction of the court; and
(8) Absent a danger to the child, the child would be released on modest bail or own recognizance were the child appearing as an adult in adult court.
(j) Factors—protection of child
Regarding the ground for detention in (c)(1)(D), the court must consider whether or not:
(1) There are means to ensure the care and protection of the child until the next scheduled court appearance;
(2) The child is addicted to or is in imminent danger from the use of a controlled substance or alcohol; and
(3) There exist other compelling circumstances that make detention reasonably necessary.
(k) Factors—protection of person or property of another
Regarding the ground for detention in (c)(1)(E), the court must consider whether or not:
(1) The alleged offense involved physical harm to the person or property of another;
(2) The prior history of the child reveals that the child has caused physical harm to the person or property of another or has posed a substantial threat to the person or property of another; and
(3) There exist other compelling circumstances that make detention reasonably necessary.
(l) Restraining orders
As a condition of release or home supervision, the court may issue restraining orders as stated in rule 5.630 or orders restraining the child from any or all of the following:
(1) Molesting, attacking, striking, sexually assaulting, or battering, or from any contact whatsoever with an alleged victim or victim’s family;
(2) Presence near or in a particular area or building; or
(3) Associating with or contacting in writing, by phone, or in person any adult or child alleged to have been a companion in the alleged offense.
End

Plain-English Summary

This is the long rule at the centre of delinquency detention. The court considers the probation officer’s written report and any other evidence, and may examine the child, a parent or guardian, or anyone with relevant knowledge.

Where the probation officer has reason to believe the child is at risk of entering foster care, the report must cover seven things: why the child was removed; any prior abuse or neglect referral and any prior dependency petition; the need for continued detention; available services to facilitate return; whether any relatives are able and willing to provide effective care and control; documentation that staying home is contrary to the child’s welfare; and documentation of the reasonable efforts made to avoid removal and what those services produced.

The child must be released unless the court finds that continuance in the home is contrary to their welfare and one of five grounds exists: violation of a court order, escape from a commitment, likelihood of flight, immediate and urgent necessity for the child’s protection, or reasonable necessity to protect another person or their property.

Two protections follow. A child who is also a dependent may not be detained because of that status or because the child welfare department cannot find a placement. And where the court releases a dependent child, it must order the department either to have the current caregiver take physical custody or to take custody itself and place the child.

Before detaining, the court must determine — case by case, stating the evidence it relied on — whether staying home is contrary to the child’s welfare and whether services exist that would prevent further detention. If services would allow the child to go home, the court must release the child and order probation to provide them. If not, it must state the facts detention rests on.

Detention requires three findings on the record and in the written order, with a reference to the report or evidence relied on: that staying home is contrary to the child’s welfare; that temporary placement and care are the probation officer’s responsibility; and that reasonable efforts were, or were not, made to avoid removal. Two orders go with them: that probation provide services as soon as possible to help the parent obtain what they need to care for the child at home, and that the child’s placement and care rest with probation pending disposition.

Each ground then has its own list of factors. For a violation of a court order: how specific the order was, the nature, circumstances, severity and gravity of the violation, whether it endangered anyone, the child’s history of obeying orders, whether the child’s attendance can be secured without detention, the conduct that brought them to court, and the likelihood of removal at disposition. For escape: whether the child was committed to a named facility and escaped from it or from lawful custody.

For flight risk: prior flight or failure to appear, means of ensuring attendance without detention, whether the child promises to appear, a history of disobeying orders, residence in the county, whether the alleged conduct or the instability of the home makes flight likely — and, notably, whether an adult in the same position would be released on modest bail or their own recognizance, absent danger to the child.

For the child’s own protection: whether the child’s care and protection can be secured until the next appearance, whether the child is addicted to or in imminent danger from a controlled substance or alcohol, and whether other compelling circumstances make detention reasonably necessary. For protecting others: whether the alleged offense involved physical harm to a person or property, whether the child’s history shows such harm or a substantial threat of it, and any other compelling circumstances.

As a condition of release or home supervision the court may issue juvenile restraining orders, or orders barring the child from molesting, attacking, striking, sexually assaulting, battering or having any contact with an alleged victim or their family; from being near a particular area or building; or from associating with or contacting an alleged companion in the offense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the grounds for detaining a child in a delinquency case?

Violation of a court order; escape from a commitment; likelihood of fleeing the court’s jurisdiction; immediate and urgent necessity for the child’s protection; or reasonable necessity for the protection of the person or property of another — and, in every case, a finding that continuance in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare.

Can a dependent child be detained because no placement is available?

No. The decision to detain must not be based on the child’s status as a dependent or on the child welfare services department’s inability to provide a placement.

What must the court do before ordering detention?

Determine, case by case and stating the evidence relied on, whether continuance in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare and whether available services would prevent further detention. If services would allow return home, the court must release the child and order probation to provide them.

Does the court consider what would happen to an adult?

Yes, on the flight-risk ground. Among the factors is whether, absent a danger to the child, the child would be released on modest bail or their own recognizance if appearing as an adult in adult court.

Can the court impose a stay-away order as a condition of release?

Yes. As a condition of release or home supervision the court may issue restraining orders under rule 5.630, or orders barring contact with an alleged victim or their family, presence near a particular area or building, or contact with an alleged companion in the offense.

Amendment History

Rule 5.760 amended effective July 1, 2023; repealed and adopted as rule 1475 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2001, July 1, 2002, January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2016; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.760 effective January 1, 2007.

(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (a) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended effective July 1, 2002.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (a); previously amended effective July 1, 2002;previously amended and relettered as subd (b) effective January 1, 2001, and as subd (c) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (c) effective July 1, 2002; previously amended and relettered as subd (d) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (b); previously relettered as subd (c) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended and relettered as subd (d) effective July 1, 2002, and as subd (e) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (f) relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2002.) (Subd (g) amended effective July 1, 2023; adopted as subd (c); previously relettered as subd (d) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective July 1, 2002, and as subd (g) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (h) amended effective July 1, 2023; adopted as subd (d); previously relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2001; amended and relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2002; previously amended effective January 1, 2006; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007) (Subd (i) amended effective July 1, 2023; adopted as subd (e); previously relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2002, and as subd (i) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (j) amended effective July 1, 2023; adopted as subd (f); previously relettered as subd (g) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective July 1, 2002, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (k) amended effective July 1, 2023; adopted as subd (g); previously relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2002, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (l) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i); previously relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2001; previously amended and relettered as subd (k) effective July 1, 2002, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: grounds for detention delinquency Californiasection 636 detention findings juveniledetention factors flight risk juvenileprobation detention report requirements